- Forums
-
Pricing
- Community Pricing
- Pricegrid
- Spreadsheet
- Browse Suggestions
- Latest Changes
- Unusual Pricelist
- Browse by Item
- Browse by Effect
- Steam Community Market
- Market Pricelist
-
Trading
- Classifieds
- Classified Listings
- Utilities
- Calculator
- Premium Search
- Statistics
First price suggestion, take it easy on me.
Bought mine for 23ish~ {14.5 + 5.56 + 3} keys in items, although a unreliable sale due to the fact it was a bulk offer and the item was purchased directly from the unboxer.
Initial sale:
https://prntscr.com/le5po9
{5.56 keys}Price of Strange Professional Killstreak Degreaser: https://prntscr.com/le5oek
{14.5 keys} Price of ProfKS Flamethrower Kit : https://prntscr.com/le5o8i
5.56 + 14.5 + 3 =
23 keysBot buy order: https://prntscr.com/le5qij
Discounting the 23 key sale because of how close it is to the bots buy order of 21, using the second sale as the basis of the suggestion.
RESALE
https://prntscr.com/le5p0i
https://prntscr.com/le5oul
Sold for 27 keys pure within the day. Taking 27, because 23 is too close to the bots buy order of 21, and could easily be considered a quicksale.
There is only one buy order for 21 and other are much lower so you may need to include 23 but not really sur tho
I think 27 is fair considering that is the amount of pure it sold for, and that is what the suggestion price is based off of.
The buy order is for 21 but the others are for any effect, and 23 in items would end up being roughly 21 (more or less) in pure. 23 would be too low.
https://backpack.tf/profiles/76561198132158932#!/compare/1542067200/1542153600
Sold mine for a C9 Modest with around 6.8 keys in items
Seller on the modest at 26 keys, so 26 + 6.8 = 32.8, rounding to 33
Possibly resuggest or wait for more sales i reckon.
no actual sale on the modest at 26 makes me think that 33 is far too high
Fair enough. Can't use BP price (outdated), but I did find this:
https://backpack.tf/profiles/76561198298103109#!/compare/1538179200/1538265600
The ham shank and ref were used. Put's it right at 24.5 in this case.
24.5 + 6.8 = 31.3, rounds to 31.
At this price I'd wait for more sales, but if you end up resuggesting for whatever reason this may be a good sale to use.
I guess I'd wait pricing this indeed. Sales are pretty discrepant.
https://backpack.tf/profiles/76561198112439292#!/compare/1540512000/1542153600
Cant trace this one completely ut that seems even lower than the other sales.
those sales are far too low to use, and the bulk sale of 31 in items sounds about right for a hat that sold for 27 keys in pure. I don't currently see a reason to resuggest b/c of the fact that they were either too low (under/close to buy order price) and can be considered a quicksell, or a bulk sale which is a lot less convenient then just taking 27.
it is not a matter of convenience. Data points are pretty scattered, and definitely dont call for a flat value here. As a result, I would refrain from pricing this as a whole, but if it were to be priced, it surely shouldn't get a flat value as of now.
An item sale of 31 keys in items is not enough to invalidate a 27 key pure sale, and that sale you just showed was an extremely low outlier, lower than my original quickbuy price.
For a new item to get a flat value when there were 4 sales is highly unusual; only very controversial suggestions have that outcome, or a suggestion where all sales happen to have been the same value.
The arguments for 23 to be too low or 31 to be too high are poor and at the very best call for leaving unpriced as opposed to a wider range here. It being close to buyers doesn't automatically make it too low (especially not given that apparently there's a sale that likely went to a quickbuyer, meaning buyers are successful), nor does it being an unboxer sale do so. The young seller (that appeared after you've dismissed the new sale provided as "too high" without further argumentation) is not enough to say it could never possibly sell for more than that.
This either needs the wide range or needs to remain unpriced for now, as I have stated previously.
Closing here based on my earlier comments.