Suggestion: Ring of Fire Wing Mann at 43 keys

Price Suggestion

Ring of Fire Wing Mann

Submitted Thu, 22 Nov 18 00:02:57 +0000 by ★ Hana

91.14%

n/a

43 keys

~50 keys

ring of fire

72 votes up

7 votes down

Related Suggestions

This suggestion was closed Sun, 23 Dec 18 22:46:16 +0000 by the submitter.

Comments can no longer be left on this suggestion.

Comments

Sale 1:

https://backpack.tf/profiles/76561198020834409#!/compare/1542585600/1542758400 sold for 10 keys and abduction phononaut

Sale 2: https://backpack.tf/profiles/76561198160856661#!/compare/1542758400/1542844800 bulk for flaming lantern wing mann

Going with 43 flat

Sale 2 is not really bulk if going with 43 Keys as it makes out 80% of item value in trade...

Also wondering about BO on the Lantern before the trade?

If the Lantern Wing Mann is 43, then subtracting the 2 taunts will make the Fire Wing Mann (being priced here) closer to the low-to-mid-20s.

To answer your questions

As for sale 2: x + the 2 taunts = flaming lantern wing mann's price

Now lets take a look at all the lantern wing mann sales (not involving scammers)

https://backpack.tf/profiles/76561198314160142#!/compare/1542412800/1542499200

https://backpack.tf/profiles/76561198055202256#!/compare/1542326400/1542499200 bulk/untrace/gambled

https://backpack.tf/profiles/76561198142892266#!/compare/1542499200/1542585600

https://backpack.tf/profiles/76561198160856661#!/compare/1542499200/1542585600 a quicksell for 28 and a tod ticket (sold in under a day of listing)

So the only option is to take the wing manns bp price (42) and take away the taunts putting this sale at 24ish if we use the bp price for the wing mann, which cannot be done anyways

As for what i listed for i listed for 42 and had it up for a day or 2 before i got this trade

1 of 2, I put mine on scm, I should probably take it off

This case seems very similar to that of the blizz wingmans two unused sales; I would suggest to leave this outdated since the buyer from sale 1 (seller from sale 2) resold much lower (Seems evident from the notions in the comment above).