Suggestion: Green Confetti Exquisite Rack at 66–70 keys

Price Suggestion

~400 keys

g.fetti

216 votes up

29 votes down

Related Suggestions

This suggestion was accepted Mon, 31 Dec 18 05:09:23 +0000 by Vijf Kilo Boter (met voetjes).

Comments can no longer be left on this suggestion.

Comments

Green Confetti Exquisite Rack or No Inspiration or Festive Deer Caller

Challenge by ApolloTheLion.

Sale #1 -

Sold for 66 keys

https://backpack.tf/profiles/76561198118859180#!/compare/1541116800/1541289600

Sale #2 -

Sold with Green Confetti Hong Kong Cone (50 keys) for Roboactive Wraith Wrap - Use there

https://backpack.tf/profiles/76561198094126723#!/compare/1542585600/1542758400

Sale #3 -

1:1 for a Sunbeams Towering Pillar of Hats

https://backpack.tf/profiles/76561198090123523#!/compare/1541721600/1541808000

Open Sunbeams Towering Pillar of Hats suggestion at 90-100.

https://backpack.tf/suggestion/5bf8a01acf6c757c6a6eb390

Sale #4 -

Sold with 10 keys + Purple Confetti Galvanized Gibus for Scorching Flames Troublemaker's Tossle Cap

https://backpack.tf/profiles/76561198073438708#!/compare/1542240000/1542326400

Mini for Scorching Flames Troublemaker's Tossle Cap

94 keys pure

https://backpack.tf/profiles/76561198078375939#!/compare/1542240000/1542326400

Sale #5 -

Thanks to Bekfust for the sale report.

https://prnt.sc/lnrpx9

Sold with 4 keys for a Blizzardy Storm Blighted Beak

https://backpack.tf/profiles/76561198107260155#!/compare/1543190400/1543276800

Using Beak's current price: 73.5 keys -4 keys =~69.5 key, rounding to 70.

We have sales at 66, 70 & 95 , calling sale 4 low.

The current sellers have been undercutting each other since the start of the suggestion.

With the only sale being at 70 since then I'm calling 95 high.

New price 66-70

First sale took 2 days after listed for 66

Better count as a qs

Any proof of that ?

im the buyer of that wlep u dont have to believe me since i guess there is not actuall proof beside me and the seller words on this

Given how close it is to the other sale I don't think that'd be an issue. However, I'd like to see how the other sellers do, since there's also a higher sale. It seems like this may just need a wider range.

None have been successful according to premium search.

Since higher sellers have remained unsuccessful, Im fine with the decision of excluding the sale at 90 here. I guess I'd have been okay with 70 flat too, but the difference here is minimal, and I don't feel thát strongly for excluding 66 here (since it's close to the other data point here).