Price Suggestion
~150 keys
darkblaze
Unusual Napper's Respite Darkblaze
6 votes up
1 vote down
Advertisement
Related Suggestions

This suggestion was closed by the submitter.

Comments can no longer be left on this suggestion.

Comments

After a long day of burning scouts and sendin' em to hell ...


Thanks to serp for helping out with the range .


Sale #1

https://backpack.tf/profiles/76561198231082180#!/compare/1547683200/1547769600


Sold for a terror Watt rack(indate) + g.confetti stash(active sugg up) + 28 keys


28+80+51 = 159

~ 159 keys

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


Sale #2

https://backpack.tf/profiles/76561198024867201#!/compare/1548115200/1548201600


Sold for a pe galvanized gibus(indate) along with 34 keys (Nappers + 34 keys for gibus)


140-34 = 106

~ 106 keys

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


Sale #3

https://backpack.tf/profiles/76561198024867201#!/compare/1548374400/1548460800


Sold for 139 keys pure


~ 139 keys

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Sale #4 invalid(scammer sales )

https://backpack.tf/profiles/76561198038366440#!/compare/1547856000/1548288000


Sold for a pe galvanized gibus(indate) along with a scorching steel toe & strange spec ks original (Nappers + steel toe + original for gibus)

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Active suggestion for stash.


https://backpack.tf/suggestion/5c4f967244325a5a05244b51

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


106 (sale #2) is a low sale compared to 139 (sale#3) and 159 (sale#1)


This going with ~139 - 159 keys.


    You really have no reason not to include 106 here, it isn’t close to buys and 106-159 isn’t a bad range whatsoever. Using your same logic, 159 is a high sale compared to 139 and 106

      159 is closer to 139 than 106 , but yes what u said makes sense.