Price Suggestion
~25 ref
Vintage Stockbroker's Scarf
15 votes up
43 votes down
Advertisement
Related Suggestions
Item Snapshot made
Classifieds
  • 22 ref
    Vintage Stockbroker's Scarf 1 Timed Drop 7573424812 198643578
$0.38
9 sold recently

This suggestion was marked as no evidence and closed by Blaze.xTH3RM4Lx.

No evidence was supplied in this price suggestion, therefore it has been closed. Please read up on how to create a suggestion before creating a new suggestion.

Comments can no longer be left on this suggestion.

Comments

One of 2 "Strange Vintage" cosmetics. Becoming more scace.


I feel the value should be raised due to lack of classified's, steam markets posts, and Marketplace.tf posts. These are becoming harder to find.

    You need sales to suggest.

      good point friend, just did some reasearch and did not realize that the strangifier existed before i opened my mouth.

        "Can't make suggestions with unusuafiliers"


        https://backpack.tf/suggestion/5b8f00adcf6c752a0c2cb246


        ...


        I think we can, so this can go though.

          Oops, my bad. But point still stands. He does need sales.

            You are correct, i have no sales data to support my claim. My suggestion is purely based on personal opinion. But hopefully i can make some magic happen and attach some good sales data to my suggestion :)

            Thank you for the support. I just find the item interesting and in need of support/love :D

                These are the two markets i considered when making my personal evaluation of this item. Marketplace.tf:

                Lowest Offer: $.99

                Highest Bid: $.18

                **This is a large spread between perceived value and intrinsic value

                REF = .04

                OFFER = .99

                .99/.04 = 24.75 REF perceived value. Which is far higher then the current valuation of BP.tf


                I don't really like using the steam market that much because i tend to find item valuation is much higher then anywhere else, but:

                Lowest Offer: $.38

                Highest Bid: $.32

                **The gap between perceived and intrinsic is very narrow, allowing much more trade an commerce here. But:

                REF = .04

                OFFER = .38

                .38/.04 = 9.5 REF These two market have very different ideas of this items valuation


                I have stated before, my personal valuation is purely opinion based, but i do believe this gap needs to be narrowed and a volatile adjustment in value could be just what this item needs to set it on track. Much like the stock market when a company's worth is dramatically increased through debt to earnings ratio or other means such as a reverse split, the company can gain interest/popularity, and an increased trading volume, and therefore increased trading prices. I believe that a rapid, sudden, and dramatic increase in trade price might just be what this item needs to not only increase its own trade volume, but the trade volume of corresponding items, such as the strangifiers (that i just learned about XD) The non-strange variant, and the chemistry sets applied.


                This was my overall train of thought when i submitted this suggestion, and this is my second time typing this because the first time i clicked "reply" again instead of "post reply" and that erased everything i spent 5 - 10 minutes typing (which i also believe could be 4 - 8 REF of my time) :D


                P.S. I also suggest we reformat this suggest/reply system. This chat board seems like 4chan quality from 1998

              Well unless there is an ACTUAL rule where it says items with strangifiers can not be priced, this can go through.

                removed. was reading an unusual suggestion. fail. this is a vintage. his price is waaay off anyways tho with lots available on scm well under this suggestion amount