- Forums
-
Pricing
- Community Pricing
- Pricegrid
- Spreadsheet
- Browse Suggestions
- Latest Changes
- Unusual Pricelist
- Browse by Item
- Browse by Effect
- Steam Community Market
- Market Pricelist
-
Trading
- Classifieds
- Classified Listings
- Utilities
- Calculator
- Premium Search
- Statistics
Sale 1: untrace
https://backpack.tf/profiles/76561198162567707#!/compare/1545523200/1545609600
https://backpack.tf/profiles/76561198129911892#!/compare/1545523200/1545609600
Sale 2: 54k worth of paints
https://backpack.tf/profiles/76561198129911892#!/compare/1545782400/1545868800
https://backpack.tf/profiles/76561198117979249#!/compare/1545782400/1545868800
Sale 3: ST Planets Bonk boy ( 40 )
https://backpack.tf/profiles/76561198117979249#!/compare/1545955200/1546041600
Sale 4: D@D Greased (use there)
https://backpack.tf/profiles/76561198095236132#!/compare/1546387200/1546473600
Sale 5: 48k
https://backpack.tf/profiles/76561198143969056#!/compare/1547164800/1547856000
https://backpack.tf/profiles/76561198208582767#!/compare/1547078400/1547164800
_
40-54 here
Bonk is duped there and may be lower given sellers at less than 40. Hard to say.
You might consider using the greased to update this since we didn't really need this for the greased.
so if i use the greased here, sales are
54, 54, 40, and 48. would support the high end and if the bonk comes out any lower itd end up at or below buyers here
so theres 2 possibles, i could drop the bonk and do 48-54 or keep it as is / range the bonk with unsold (39) which would still come out to 40 for the low end
which do you think would work?
Yeah, well thought out. I was thinking the same thing as well. I wasn't sure which is why I didn't give a suggested range. I think either can work or may be best to wait for another sale.
Assuming no other sale occurs in a reasonable amount of time, would this be better than current price?
In my opinion, this is really basically the same as the current price. But a range of 48-54 would be a bit higher. So the question is whether the current price is accurate or whether this needs a bit of a range. And I'm honestly not sure without more data.
With the discussion above in mind, I would be okay with either two options proposed; either leave this outdated, or resuggest this at 48-54. Neither has a strong preference for me. It seems like we did not get any additional data points to work with, sadly.