Part of a Quad-Weapon deal, taking 1.75$ per key, being 1.56 in €
€80 / 1.56 = 51.28..... rounding to 50.
We are going to require more data/details on a controversial case like this. We have no compare link, no identity, no dates. Histories tell us nothing, we have no screenshot of the actual trade, no sell listings, no trade agreements. The only things these screenshots show is that someone (? we dont even know who) mentioned these four items along with mentioning values.
Usually in bulk trades like these, unless all were bought for their full listed buyouts, these trades are not used for suggestions. Special exceptions can be made where the price can be split evenly among the amount of items involved (see this: https://backpack.tf/suggestion/575c746cc440456a17243b24 ), where it is likely that the items are of the same tier, which I do not believe to be a logical assumption here.
The last case I've seen like this that I can remember was this:
Which were closed too for a similar reason. The information present in those suggestions differs from what we have here, but the thing they have in common is that both are incomplete, and with what we have here, I would close these too.
Fair enough, though I gave my vows to not reveal someone's identity.
Alas, I'll go ahead and close the suggestions myself.
https://gyazo.com/8738b9fd056f06c937b9a6f087844f10
https://gyazo.com/6ac34cdb6bc9e42342bf6dd9da51a389
Part of a Quad-Weapon deal, taking 1.75$ per key, being 1.56 in €
€80 / 1.56 = 51.28..... rounding to 50.
We are going to require more data/details on a controversial case like this. We have no compare link, no identity, no dates. Histories tell us nothing, we have no screenshot of the actual trade, no sell listings, no trade agreements. The only things these screenshots show is that someone (? we dont even know who) mentioned these four items along with mentioning values.
Usually in bulk trades like these, unless all were bought for their full listed buyouts, these trades are not used for suggestions. Special exceptions can be made where the price can be split evenly among the amount of items involved (see this: https://backpack.tf/suggestion/575c746cc440456a17243b24 ), where it is likely that the items are of the same tier, which I do not believe to be a logical assumption here.
The last case I've seen like this that I can remember was this:
https://backpack.tf/suggestion/5ba144eacf6c757f6368947b
https://backpack.tf/suggestion/5ba1452744325a1ee032f9b9
Which were closed too for a similar reason. The information present in those suggestions differs from what we have here, but the thing they have in common is that both are incomplete, and with what we have here, I would close these too.
Fair enough, though I gave my vows to not reveal someone's identity.
Alas, I'll go ahead and close the suggestions myself.