Suggestion: Burning Flames Samur-Eye at 220 keys

Price Suggestion

~1000 keys

burning

44 votes up

14 votes down

Related Suggestions

This suggestion was accepted Wed, 27 Nov 19 18:05:31 +0000 by Vijf Kilo Boter (met voetjes).

Comments can no longer be left on this suggestion.

Comments

Here we go

Only sale

Sold for a Circling TF Logo Antlers

https://backpack.tf/profiles/76561198151087213#!/compare/1568160000/1568246400

The Antlers were a 1:1

The mini for the Circling TF Logo Antlers

Sold on marketplace.tf for $400

https://marketplace.tf/items/tf2/993;5;u11

Keys at the time were going for 1.82

https://marketplace.tf/items/tf2/5021;6

220x1.82=400.4

going with 220 flat

Let me know what you think

I think this suggestion bad

What do you mean?

Collector buys a samur eye for $1000 and then resells for a misc priced at 220 keys, it just doesnt' seem logical to include this sale.

But there are no other minis for this. The Misc only has one sale at $400 which would be valid tho.

I mean he owns the hat, so he's upset.

Solid suggestion, either way, upvote.

How informative

pays $1100 for the samur-eye and then sells it for a 220 key misc does seem odd, not gonna vote on this since it can go both ways.

i did made a suggestion on the misc giving a range. But i was told it would be better used for the samur-eye

https://backpack.tf/suggestion/5d9e553f67807208eb445cab#comment-5d9e57c7d381727d172799f9

If the samur-eyes suggestion was in-date i would make a suggestion for the antlers. But there is no minis for it and this is the only sale its had.

And it sold a week ago for $400 full price in keys.

I'll keep this up and let the mods decide.

Sold for $250

https://marketplace.tf/items/tf2/359;5;u13

Keys were $1.81

https://marketplace.tf/items/tf2/5021;6

139x1.81=251.49

Going with 139 keys

This looks like a quicksell And was duped

which should not matter.

User paid $1100 for these, but it was more than 18 months ago and really shouldn't impact the integrity of this suggestion now.

No other clean sales on this since the antlers trade, should be good to go

thanks man

Given the circumstances Im fine with this with the fact that the purchase was 2 years ago in mind. The issue with someone paying large amounts and then reselling for less is mostly a problem with traders that resell very fast. Its hard to determine a reasonable cutoff for this that is not fully arbitrary; I'd generally refer to a time frame similar to the one we use for hats to be in-date (so 3 months), but a sale that happened 2 years ago should definitely have no bearing; there are plenty of reasons to resell lower after that long that do not really have to do with impulse buying, and in general, the market now is not comparable to the market 2 years ago.