Price Suggestion
~1600 keys
shadow
Unusual Liquidator's Lid Poisoned Shadows
48 votes up
17 votes down
Advertisement
Related Suggestions

This suggestion was accepted by Shuffle Spy.

Comments can no longer be left on this suggestion.

Comments

    If he bought it for 200 Keys and sold it for less, then both sales shouldn't be used.

      How long before he resold it?

        A month i think. After 2 weeks, he then listed it for sale at 200 Keys for a day, i don't know what happen after that.

        https://bot.tf/stats/listings/M0D6E01E

        https://bot.tf/stats/listings/MVR0L3G3

        https://backpack.tf/item/2031964177

          Hm, im not that sure, but i think there was something about it being fine if there was a lenghty period between when he bought and sold

            I tried reading for it in the pricing rules but god damn it is lengthy and utterly confusing.

              Sales older than 2 months old are not valid proof; this does not mean that they are not useful. Feel free to include them to provide supplemental proof. Just don't rely on them to set your range.

              Exceptions: For very rare hats, if there have only been 1-2 sales in the last 3 months, a trade up to 3 months old is okay to use as proof to establish more data points. Keep in mind, new sales should take precedence over older ones.

                Why you paste this here

                  Meant to post it under Vader's comment but I guess it kind of applies to yours as well. Since if there was a lengthy period between sales then the suggestion should be at 150 keys, which in a normal scenario would be correct but a clarification for rare hats states that both sales count if it within 3 months. At least that is how I'm understanding it.

                    That rule has nothing to do with the concern of Vader's first comment or in fact, with any of our comments

                      I'm sorry are we reading the same thing???


                      vader said, "If he bought it for 200 Keys and sold it for less, then both sales shouldn't be used."

                      Rule says, "if there have only been 1-2 sales in the last 3 months, a trade up to 3 months old is okay to use as proof"

                        What


                        Edit: Nonono, his point is that if the purchaser bought for 200 and resold for less than said amount, it would mean that the purchaser could be an impulse buyer or something similar to that and that their sales, at least not ones that were resold at a later date for less, should not be used. However i brought up that if there was a lenghty period between buying and reselling for less, then both of the sales could possibly be used, if i remember correctly.

                          Bruh this stuff isn't for me, I apologize. Should i keep this up or start a new suggestion?

                            Nothing to apologize for. Keep it up, atm its 2 options, resuggest at 150-200 or close the suggestion entirely. Will need a mod's input before further actions.