Price Suggestion
~12 keys
Unique Spine-Chilling Skull 2011
148 votes up
121 votes down
Advertisement
Related Suggestions
Item Snapshot made
Classifieds
  • 75 keys
    Unique Spine-Chilling Skull 2011 31 Timed Drop Team Spirit spells 8166477995 566638613
  • 25 keys
    Unique Spine-Chilling Skull 2011 31 Purchased The Color of a Gentlemann's Business Pants spells 8432209503 551700916
  • 8 keys
    Unique Spine-Chilling Skull 2011 31 Purchased The Color of a Gentlemann's Business Pants 8581328025 543586953
  • 8 keys
    Unique Spine-Chilling Skull 2011 31 Purchased A Distinctive Lack of Hue 8658853827 561522518
  • 15 keys
    Unique Spine-Chilling Skull 2011 31 Purchased Indubitably Green 8687390505 557624343
  • 8 keys
    Unique Spine-Chilling Skull 2011 31 Purchased 8675009572 552631768
  • 6 keys
    Unique Spine-Chilling Skull 2011 31 Purchased Color No. 216-190-216 8736093150 552669243
  • 7.76 keys
    Unique Spine-Chilling Skull 2011 31 Purchased 8647784456 548244169
  • 7.76 keys
    Unique Spine-Chilling Skull 2011 31 Purchased Muskelmannbraun 8717167910 549409404
  • 7.75 keys
    Unique Spine-Chilling Skull 2011 31 Purchased A Distinctive Lack of Hue 8734111323 543758162
  • 3.45 keys
    Unique Spine-Chilling Skull 2011
  • 1.7 keys
    Unique Spine-Chilling Skull 2011
  • 3.45 keys
    Unique Spine-Chilling Skull 2011
  • 4.52 keys
    Unique Spine-Chilling Skull 2011
  • 4.54 keys
    Unique Spine-Chilling Skull 2011
  • 5 keys
    Unique Spine-Chilling Skull 2011 A Distinctive Lack of Hue
  • 4.5 keys
    Unique Spine-Chilling Skull 2011
  • 3.45 keys
    Unique Spine-Chilling Skull 2011
  • 4.47 keys
    Unique Spine-Chilling Skull 2011
  • 4.5 keys
    Unique Spine-Chilling Skull 2011
$10.94
4 sold recently

This suggestion was marked as insufficient evidence and closed by A Delicious Cashew™.

The evidence provided does not meet the standard for making suggestions on this site. Please refer to the guides for unusual or non-unusual suggestions for more information.

Comments can no longer be left on this suggestion.

Comments

All the screenshots of what I will describe are in this post : https://imgur.com/a/KH6lPHG

The bp.tf listings are between 4.5 keys (5 keys for a painted one) for buyers and 6 keys for the lowest seller (see screenshots)

stn_trading buys at 4k and sells for 8k (see screenshots)

mp.tf sells for a bit more than 5.5 keys (see screenshots)

Taking the lowest selling price of all those and the highest buying price of all those gives us a price around 4.5-5.5 keys which seems coherent.

      Looks like my collection is gonna stop growing, I am a sad boi :3

        I'm not certain if I've got it

      Need proof of sales, not the listings.

        My values are in the interval, and considering the number of bots quickbuying at 4.5 the weak point is the high bar at 5.5 which may be too low. At least it can't be worse than the actual pricing at 2keys xD

      Current classified sellers at 4.77, this looks like it will be too high


      Not quite sure if you provided sales at 4.5 and 5.5 either - you need proof that they have actually sold for those amounts

        see the link where I gathered the sales proofs in most of the state of the qb prices : https://imgur.com/a/KH6lPHG including sales at 5 keys pure exactly.

          sales at 5 =/= sales at 4.5 nor 5.5

            I prefered to have an uncertainty interval so as to be more rigorous. According to all the clues I gathered it seems to be a legitimate interval.

              bptf doesn't operate like that. if the sales are at 5, then the recorded price is 5. rounding is done, but not pulling ranges from nowhere


              also doesn't address cashew's thing that the sellers indicate your suggested high end is too high. sellers are even lower now (below 4.5)

                I totally agree that the price fell since the last time I recorded all these, but I couldn't guess all this. At the time I've done the screenshots you can see that the situation was far different with bots QBing at 4.6k and lowest sellers at 8k. For the range I must apologize, that's the first time I really tried to make a suggestion and I took my reflex of scientist to put ranges. I apologize I must say that I am just learning all what you say, I did not know it before and even if you kind of say it harshly I must thank you all for teaching me how to do price suggestions properly <3

                  you should close this. if you want to learn more about suggesting, I'd recommend voting more and taking a look at suggestions that are getting accepted

                    I fear, by voting, to share my ignorance and be dangerous for the community. In my mind there is not worse vote than the vote of someone who doesn't know how the things are supposed to be.

                      close this

                        I don't know how is the % of voting? And I don't understand why so many people downvote my last message, it is as if they thought that voting for something one ignores is clever.

                          Price sugs don't actually get accepted by majority vote, votes only let the moderators who actually accept or deny these suggestions to see how the community feels about the price change. Withdrawing your vote won't change how the moderators accept/deny these suggestions.

                  ^This is correct - you need sales at 4.5 and 5.5 to have a range of 4.5-5.5.