The comparisons made here do not really hold up. First of all, all those cases are double spelled. Secondly, all those cases have multiple sales on other copies to create an average, and this one does not.

Not to mention the fact that one of the mangler sales you provide as evidence that double spelled = automatically much higher supports my stance more than your own as its practically in the suggested range.

https://backpack.tf/suggestion/5d613a5fd381721071674266 spelled collectors also selling below average, as is the case with this particular crossbow, and Im willing to bet that the same is the case in that phlog where you didnt mention the sales.

Spelled items can sell higher and it may be a weighing factor in someones decision making, but reasons beyond just the spell can also compel a trader to make a decision to pay a lot for an item:

https://backpack.tf/suggestion/5e88aaf80b4e01324d46953e

I cant stress enough that Im NOT saying that:

- Spells never add value

- Spelled sales can never be an outlier

- When ample evidence is provided that an item was bought solely for the spells they should still always be included

What I am saying is that a spell does not automatically mean the sale is never usable. Who is to say this person didn't just want the crossbow? I see no others for sale at first glance.

Since this lacks data for comparison I am in favor of this being usable, but you are free to gather second opinions.