Suggestion: Haunted Ghosts Convict Cap at 8–10 keys

Price Suggestion

~12.5 keys

ghosts

54 votes up

3 votes down

Related Suggestions

This suggestion was closed Sat, 01 Aug 20 10:46:01 +0000 by the submitter.

Comments can no longer be left on this suggestion.

Comments

sale1 : 20$/1.98$ = 10.1---> rounding to 10

https://marketplace.tf/items/tf2/31080;5;u8

sale2 : 35$/2$ = 17,5 (high outlier)

https://marketplace.tf/items/tf2/31080;5;u8 (same link as above)

sale3 : bulk for a HG Law

https://backpack.tf/profiles/76561198813326440#!/compare/1593302400/1593388800

https://backpack.tf/profiles/76561198286257338#!/compare/1593216000/1593302400

sale4 : Buyer told that it sold for 7.5 keys----> rounding to 8

https://backpack.tf/profiles/76561198813326440#!/compare/1592006400/1592092800

https://backpack.tf/item/8244078796

https://imgur.com/a/pve00Ol

Help #1 thx 42

Help #2 thx xXFluttershy_Fucker79Xx

Can you get a screenshot of the 7.5 sale? Can't trace it through the compares.

https://backpack.tf/profiles/76561198453530349#!/compare/1592006400/1592092800

https://backpack.tf/profiles/76561198998082956#!/compare/1592092800/1592438400

https://bot.tf/stats/listings/4P0X6G03 - B/O was 8 keys 2.77 ref

Likely sold for 8 keys 2.77 ref, but can't fully trace

Since this is under 10 keys, you should round sales to the nearest .5. Once you get the screenshot of the 7.5 sale 7.5 - 10 should be fine for this

Okay, first of all thanks for the help! :)

The sale you found falls into my range so that is fine.

Regarding the range itself I will change that (I wasnt aware about the rulechange for super low tiers).

Sale4 on the other hand, why would I need a screenshot of the sale if the buyer told me for how much he bought it. I have seen this kind of proof many times.

While its most likely the buyer is telling the truth, it is possible they remembered incorrectly, or that the sale actually rounds to a different number, etc. Screenshot proof backs up these statement, confirming without doubt that that is the sale.

That is obvious, but I dont see why the traders memory should be questionable in this specific case (trade happend just two weeks before his statement).

Anyway I really dont care about these contributor points, if you want to make a countersuggestion feel free to do so :)

btw: thanks for taking your time

This suggestion probably will not pass (even re-suggested at 7.5-10) without screenshot proof of the sale unfortunately. I don't want to take this suggestion from you (I need points less than you do), I am just letting you know that if you want to price this, you will need to get a screenshot.

no new sales here, just updating, screenshot would help confirm the sale.

updated classies

https://gyazo.com/ead64956b65f2a2e9d000768ef4ccdae

Update:

Both parties of the trade in question are annoyed by me and dont reply anymore. To be honest i cant blame them.

And I still dont get, how same suggestions (that use the same proof-methode as I did) for sales including hundreds of keys are accepted, while in my case the trader cant be trusted to count to 7.

Anyway I will now close the suggestion.

BTW: thx for the advise/help: 42, xXFluttershy_Fucker79Xx (LEV), Xergoyf and suRz ✌