Suggestion: Strange Thunderbolt Sniper Rifle (Factory New) at 185 keys

The sale considered for the Thunderbolt in the Tricorne suggestion was 5 months outdated (to this suggestion) when this Thunderbolt suggestion was made.

The Tricorne suggestion happened in April, when that 130 key Thunderbolt sale was the only sale usable on any Thunderbolts, and thus it was used on the Tricorne.

That being said, a sale from February shouldn't be affecting this sale 4 months later.

The point is that the tricorne supports a far lower value. Your sales here are basically ~100, ~130/~140 (depending on what way you look at it) and 185, so a flat raise to 185 does not work.

Why are these outdated sales from February and April being considered as proof?

The $180 Marketplace sale is a user who quicksold his entire backpack on Marketplace

https://backpack.tf/profiles/76561198044090934#!/compare/1588118400/1594080000

Including a spelled strange awper that sold for $40 and flipped for 100+ keys multiple times

You mean why two sales from your own suggestion are considered proof? come on man.

The February sale was far outdated when this suggestion was made, it's not even included in the suggestion

And the Tricorne sale was already accepted using that February sale, which was already far and out of the way from this suggestion

https://gyazo.com/403adeb9eebce38ccc1ee36677b0af79 the tricorne sale is in your suggestion. As I said, the tricorne sale, not the sale from february, thát tricorne sale supports a lower value here.

So you have 3 sales here in your suggestion, that would be ~100, ~130/~140 depending on what way you look at it (going to specify here that 140 in this case is using the tricorne as it would be had the sale from feb not been used there as a mini, also coinciding with the buyout, further supporting that sale should AT THE VERY LEAST not be valued over 140) and ~185, so a flat raise to 185 is a no go here since every single other data point points towards 185 flat being too high.

Thank you for the explanation.