my point being proof shouldn't ALWAYS be a replacement for common sense, especially with the knowledge that a hat can and *has* sold for more. Nobody with decent knowledge of pricing would look at this hat and think, "this is only worth 21 keys." Not really a provable point, but should be easy to understand if you've ever looked at a hat and thought "I could get x keys for this," only to see it suggested for much less, and subsequently pass on the opportunity to buy.

I've seen counter-points to this idea, "Whoever wants the hat will pay what they deem fair, it'll be repriced afterwards. If nobody pays more than the suggested price, then the pricing is accurate." I guess my problem is that some people's pricing doesn't go beyond looking at the last passed suggestion.

Consider the 16 and 21 key sales on this hat were deemed outliers, and 47 was suggested. Someone might offer their 45 key hat for this, thinking "I'm getting a deal here," have it accepted, and the sale would be used to further support the 47 key sale. Were the 21 key sale to pass, that same potential buyer might be offered the same trade, and decline saying "It's only worth 21 keys, what a lowball." I feel like this is a common occurrence, that low suggestions discourage future buyers in some way or another. No way to prove it with numbers of course, just feel like the possibility shouldn't be discounted if the goal is to find an accurate price