- Forums
-
Pricing
- Community Pricing
- Pricegrid
- Spreadsheet
- Browse Suggestions
- Latest Changes
- Unusual Pricelist
- Browse by Item
- Browse by Effect
- Steam Community Market
- Market Pricelist
-
Trading
- Classifieds
- Classified Listings
- Utilities
- Calculator
- Premium Search
- Statistics
Sold
Item 1
https://backpack.tf/item/1916398298
Sale 1
https://backpack.tf/profiles/76561199084784906#!/compare/1609200000/1609286400
https://backpack.tf/profiles/76561198967177877#!/compare/1610236800/1610236800
Untrace
Sale 2
https://backpack.tf/profiles/76561198967177877#!/compare/1610236800/1610236800
https://backpack.tf/profiles/76561198043918649#!/compare/1611014400/1611100800
Untrace
Sale 3
https://backpack.tf/profiles/76561198043918649#!/compare/1611532800/1611705600
https://backpack.tf/profiles/76561198082401774#!/compare/1611619200/1611705600
Sold for 9 keys
Sale 4
https://prnt.sc/10f7c59
Sold to me for 8 keys 32.22 ref
Taking 8.5 keys here
Sale 5
https://prnt.sc/10f7cg6
Sold for 9 keys 33 ref
Taking 9.5 keys here
Sales
9, 8.5, 9.5
Given that 8.5 was a buy order and that 9 keys dumped for 8.5 keys within a day, or even a couple of hours, I think that's enoough reasoning to exclude the 9 key and 8.5 key sale.
Going with a refresh of 9.5 keys
I don't think 9 should be excluded here. I've been in this situation before where a sale on the low end got dumped for less. The fact 9 got dumped for less would support including it as the low end and giving this a slight drop
Makes enough sense, I was tempted to add to the end that I'd resuggest at 9 - 9.5 if need be. WIll wait for a mod comment, ty
sounds good