- Forums
-
Pricing
- Community Pricing
- Pricegrid
- Spreadsheet
- Browse Suggestions
- Latest Changes
- Unusual Pricelist
- Browse by Item
- Browse by Effect
- Steam Community Market
- Market Pricelist
-
Trading
- Classifieds
- Classified Listings
- Utilities
- Calculator
- Premium Search
- Statistics
Re-suggestion because i didn't price it correctly and i didn't round the number on my previous suggestion.
Item 1: https://backpack.tf/item/8348164681
Item 2: https://backpack.tf/item/8764185672
Item 3: https://backpack.tf/item/9854393003
Item 4: https://backpack.tf/item/9617128334
Only one recent sale for months. I Purchased this unusual.
Trade with Fez: https://gyazo.com/7b6a6837c2eaa2cce6bc3bd6f0a0ce65
Frozen Icefall Bumble Beenie, Strange Australium Rocket Launcher, Strange Australium Medi-Gun and 18 keys pure.
84 + 57 + 43.5 + 18 = 202.5 keys. 202.5 keys rounded to 203 keys.
I think this should be rounded to the nearest 10 keys. (Guideline - for hats 200-1000 keys, please round to the nearest 10 keys). So I think you should use 200 flat. (Not sure). It could also be to the nearest 5, so 205.
That is only a guideline, it is not required for unusuals over 10 keys.
Oh ok. Thanks for the info :)
I can understand that your purchase is the most recent just by glancing at the histories. But:
https://backpack.tf/suggestion/60686ab359519b63222a8776
At the time of you making this suggestion here, Fez's purchase was just about indate, considering February is 28 days.
Especially when pricing an item like this, it's definitely always better to have more sales involved in making your decision.
That being said:
https://backpack.tf/profiles/76561198096309056#!/compare/1609545600/1609804800
https://backpack.tf/profiles/76561198026198026#!/compare/1609545600/1609632000
Untrace, seems to have been keys, the strange diamond bot killer scatter matches.
If Fez looks at this, please could you provide your purchase. Much appreciated
Fez told me that he bought it for 160 keys pure
Fez's purchase was a bit over 2 months before this sale and was outdated at the time of the suggestion so I think this is probably fine. 160 is close enough to 203 that it doesn't completely go against this price; if it was at 100 for instance I would argue to leave this outdated, but as-is this is fine.