Price Suggestion
Cloud 9 Lil' Bitey
Submitted by aj
~180 keys
cloud 9
Unusual Lil' Bitey Cloud 9
139 votes up
7 votes down
Advertisement
Related Suggestions

This suggestion was accepted by Vijf Kilo Boter (met voetjes).

Comments can no longer be left on this suggestion.

Comments

Mic check

What the fuck

Join this discord thingy please or I shoot

https://discord.gg/EphDURbAXT


Item history

https://backpack.tf/item/9033843145


Sold on cs.deals

https://gyazo.com/a237b7fb9b80bf5e2d6ffd8d912ebe97

Apr 28th - $360


Kinda hard to say what keys were back then uhhh

Keys are now $1.7, could take that


$360 / $1.7 = 211.76


I go 210 keys lmao

    Very confused as on that screenshot I do not see an effect anywhere, except for starstorm insomnia in the background, so I dont really know what to do with this

      I should clarify. Cs.deals does not show effect of which sold.

      However, I know that the c9 bitey had been listed at $360 on the site for a while now, it's unfortunate I don't have a screenshot to back this up but I'm sure various others in the community would be able to support this.


      The Starstorm Insomnia one in the background is my one. You can only access previous sales of a hat if there is currently one listed on Cs.deals, and so I listed mine to get access to the sales history. Apologies for not making that any clearer in the suggestion, it does look super confusing.


      As far as how to prove it's the same hat that sold. Well, the history shows Monday 26th it leaves the Cs.deals bot inventory and I'd have to check compares, but it more or less lines up correctly to the time of the sale

        https://imgur.com/a/KUkZXnc

        https://etherscan.io/tx/0x41c64cbb9803f8ba97b856889ff222d7a450a3a4cf98ce509582d1ad0b764946

        Here is the ETH transaction as well as as many screenshots I could get from the buyer of the C9 Bitey

          Im still on the fence on using something we cannot really verify, though I suppose there's a lot provided here. I'll run it by the other mods

      Given the degree of supporting evidence provided here I'm inclined to accept this as is