- Forums
-
Pricing
- Community Pricing
- Pricegrid
- Spreadsheet
- Browse Suggestions
- Latest Changes
- Unusual Pricelist
- Browse by Item
- Browse by Effect
- Steam Community Market
- Market Pricelist
-
Trading
- Classifieds
- Classified Listings
- Utilities
- Calculator
- Premium Search
- Statistics
Re-suggestion, thanks khiro!
Sale 1: 90 keys
https://backpack.tf/profiles/76561199009890800#!/compare/1621900800/1621987200
https://imgur.com/YvEJi2c
Sale 2:
https://marketplace.tf/items/tf2/626;5;u89
Sale on 4/1 for $200
- 200/2.15 (key price on marketplace at the time) = 93
Sale 3:
Sale on 3/9
https://backpack.tf/profiles/76561198804015732#!/compare/1615161600/1615248000
https://backpack.tf/profiles/76561199111073161#!/compare/1615161600/1615248000
https://backpack.tf/profiles/76561199111073161#!/compare/1615161600/1615248000
(Cheers Shuffle Spy for the price observation)
First concluded 90-93..?
Final suggestion @ 78-93 keys.
Also, sale 3 is also horribly outdated now too. Best to just go for 90 now.
You didn't need to resuggest again just for that as you weren't changing the suggested price. Also I know shuffle said to go 78-93 as you had started this way back when sale 2 was still indate, but I'm of the opinion that you're better off dropping sale 2 at this point as it's been so long.
That would be the logical case, but suggesting a price for a hat that has had only 3 sales seen with a price that is somewhat out of date isn't unreasonable.
Why bother with "somewhat out of date" when you could use something recent enough to be valid?
93 was only 1 month from 78. Our lack of handling the backlog shouldn't invalidate a sale that was missed for 2 months.