Price Suggestion
~148.5 keys
Collector's Festive Black Box
55 votes up
5 votes down
Advertisement
Related Suggestions
Item Snapshot made
Classifieds
  • 67 keys
    Collector's Festive Black Box 89 Recipe output 10425626148 9445401789
  • 67 keys
    Collector's Festive Black Box 62 Recipe output 10248737019 8494149773
  • 80 keys
    Collector's Festive Black Box 26 Recipe output 9643123575 4894151586
  • 34.39 keys
    Collector's Festive Black Box
  • 36.17 keys
    Collector's Festive Black Box
  • 36.31 keys
    Collector's Festive Black Box
  • 37.09 keys
    Collector's Festive Black Box
  • 38 keys
    Collector's Festive Black Box
  • 38.05 keys
    Collector's Festive Black Box
  • 40 keys
    Collector's Festive Black Box
  • 40 keys
    Collector's Festive Black Box
  • 40 keys
    Collector's Festive Black Box
  • 40 keys
    Collector's Festive Black Box
$114.37
0 sold recently

This suggestion was closed by the submitter.

Comments can no longer be left on this suggestion.

Comments

    As I discussed in my suggestion for this, I still think it's better to not use proks here. The market still values them at a premium compared to the unmodified.

    (buyers at ~16 usd more on the SCM than the regular, ~5keys more in the classifieds than the regular)

      I understand your stance on this and I agree it does add value, but I don’t think the difference is significant enough on an item with a value like this to warrant excluding it. Sellers at 67k for non KS atm so I think this is fine.

        You can see from the buyers that it adds a few to several keys though. You'd really be better off just going with the specks sale as that kit is cheap enough to ignore because of rounding down. It's clear the market values the proks add-on enough for it to get a noticeable increase in value over an unmodified/cheaply modified version.

          I’ve come round to your thinking on this, but tbh I think sales on this are probably going to rise anyway. Despite being a bit inaccurate now, this will probably be a better range for the foreseeable future.

            Suggested prices shouldn't be based on speculation or lead the market.

              I have nothing else to say regarding this suggestion, if you feel 60 is more appropriate you may counter at that