- Forums
-
Pricing
- Community Pricing
- Pricegrid
- Spreadsheet
- Browse Suggestions
- Latest Changes
- Unusual Pricelist
- Browse by Item
- Browse by Effect
- Steam Community Market
- Market Pricelist
-
Trading
- Classifieds
- Classified Listings
- Utilities
- Calculator
- Premium Search
- Statistics
https://backpack.tf/item/10867078455
301 keys BARELY out of date.
https://backpack.tf/profiles/76561198007696852#!/compare/1670025600/1673308800
Bulk https://backpack.tf/profiles/76561198927172159#!/compare/1677024000/1677369600
No other sales and 1/1.
Taking 301, hopefully should be okay.
2 new sales, both bulks though
This is from the same time frame as the last suggestion and should include 250 in the range, as was mentioned here:
https://backpack.tf/suggestion/63bcafbf33cfc4bd6c0d2ebb
It might have been unintentional, but be wary of this for future suggestions; you cannot wait until all sales except for the last one go outdated to enforce a flat value based on that sale alone. Stressing here that I do not suspect this was on purpose, but pointing out the loophole we wish to avoid.
Sorry about that, I didn’t realize there was another usable sale. Should I re-suggest with 250 included or does it matter at this point?
Yeah its best to resuggest at 250-300
Even with it being pretty well out of date at this point?
yeah; usually we do not allow sales that old, but we're lenient when it concerns resuggestions. The alternative would be to leave it outdated, but I'm fine with the range.