Personally, given the recent state of market manipulation on this item, I don't think any suggestion should be accepted for a bit, but feel free to interpret the data above however you please.
I'm no expert but I feel like as long as the suggestion is bringing it down to the old original price before the market manipulation, then that's kinda alright, but I have no clue about what I'm talking about lol
Current suggestion is an increase, no price has been accepted on this item in 11 years.
Oh damn, so people are still trying to up the price even after the fiasco?
not really. this is nothing more than a scrapbank
Any item: *goes up in price because of buyers*
People: mArKeT mAniPulAtiOn
Big ^^ from me
We gave this a month to see if the demand would stick post-"hype", but it doesn't look like that was the case:
There are not enough sales in a recent timeline to indicate that this would be accurate anymore. When compared to something like the vaccinator, there's barely any sales here. In my personal opinion, there being no automated buyers at 0.11 should've been a clear indicator that this wouldn't work out at all.
Past 30 days
1 @ 0.05 ref
74 @ 0.11 ref
14 @ 0.11 ref
https://gladiator.tf/sales?item=Lollichop&at=2023-03-12T04:14:25.869Z
https://backpack.tf/profiles/76561198080112564#!/compare/1677110400/1678579200
https://backpack.tf/profiles/76561198293497760#!/compare/1676505600/1677110400
Successful buyers at 0.11 ref
https://gyazo.com/8720f572e8ce722d12625b9dccf3c7ad
Still available from Scrap.tf and STN for 0.05 ref
https://gyazo.com/eeb54beabeeba4c0f47915c4d4c8a585
Sellers down to 0.11, only a few manual buyers at 0.11, rest at 0.05
Going with 0.05 - 0.11 ref.
Cool, now let's get that strange variant back down too
Idk much about suggestions but i know this price looks nice. I agree.
This would be epic
Elmaxo would be proud of us, Rainy. Upvote, Vege. Stellar work as usual. ^_^
I Love Market Manipulation
Oh yeahhhhh
1 month later, here are the glad stats
https://gladiator.tf/sales?item=Lollichop&at=2023-04-09T20:14:47.714Z
SALES
3 @ 0.11 ref
10 @ 0.16 ref
128 @ 0.22 ref
1 @ 0.33 ref
2 @ 1 ref
5 @ 1.88 ref
BOUGHT
1 @ 0.05 ref
15 @ 0.11 ref
93 @ 0.16 ref
610 @ 0.22 ref
Bulk of transactions at 0.22 ref.
Personally, given the recent state of market manipulation on this item, I don't think any suggestion should be accepted for a bit, but feel free to interpret the data above however you please.
I'm no expert but I feel like as long as the suggestion is bringing it down to the old original price before the market manipulation, then that's kinda alright, but I have no clue about what I'm talking about lol
Current suggestion is an increase, no price has been accepted on this item in 11 years.
Oh damn, so people are still trying to up the price even after the fiasco?
not really. this is nothing more than a scrapbank
Any item: *goes up in price because of buyers*
People: mArKeT mAniPulAtiOn
Big ^^ from me
We gave this a month to see if the demand would stick post-"hype", but it doesn't look like that was the case:
https://gladiator.tf/sales?item=Lollichop&at=2023-04-23T05:25:14.275Z
Last week, ~55 relevant sales.
https://gladiator.tf/sales?item=Lollichop&at=2023-04-16T05:25:14.275Z
2 weeks ago, ~67 relevant sales.
There are not enough sales in a recent timeline to indicate that this would be accurate anymore. When compared to something like the vaccinator, there's barely any sales here. In my personal opinion, there being no automated buyers at 0.11 should've been a clear indicator that this wouldn't work out at all.
Current price will be fine for now.