- Forums
-
Pricing
- Community Pricing
- Pricegrid
- Spreadsheet
- Browse Suggestions
- Latest Changes
- Unusual Pricelist
- Browse by Item
- Browse by Effect
- Steam Community Market
- Market Pricelist
-
Trading
- Classifieds
- Classified Listings
- Utilities
- Calculator
- Premium Search
- Statistics
1 in date sale
https://backpack.tf/item/12807779436
(Seller) https://backpack.tf/profiles/76561198040351624#!/compare/1685664000/1685923200
(Buyer) https://backpack.tf/profiles/76561198867208675#!/compare/1685491200/1685836800
Sold for 654 keys, rounding down to 650
I'd buy this for 650 rn lol.
seems like a qs imo
Can't use gladiator anymore but bot buy orders have been at 600 - 650 for the past half an year+, obviously a quicksale price. Not me or anyone else will sell it to you for the 2 bad spell hats I rejected from you, go blatantly rage suggest elsewhere mate.
If you don't like offers that's fine. I'm always willing to add quite a bit to anything I send, but that's has no relevance in a price suggestion. Ge headprize was sitting at a buy out of 750 keys for a while so this suggestion will stay up
You're suggesting this barely above bot buyers from a week ago when a 22k$ bp has commented even they'd buy this for 650 right now. Oh and the GE one didn't "sit for a while", it sold within a week, deceptive speech is a funny thing I know. Go rage suggest other unus after your offers get rejected, this suggestion is false and dead to begin with.
lol, how is this suggestion even a thing, repricing equivalent to some low tier 1gen head prize
It should be noted that personal feelings do not invalidate a sale. However backpack.tf mods can deem this sale as an outlier
talked to the seller. sold for 750k pure + lot of adds (1050k claimed total). can provide screenshot of the conversation if needed.
What seller? Sure post whatever you like if it's relevant. Not sure if you're talking about the ge one but the buyout on that was 750
The seller I talked to, is the same person in this comparison (https://backpack.tf/profiles/76561198040351624#!/compare/1685664000/1685923200).
I'd also like to correct myself, she said "1050ish, 850 pure plus some other bits". I'd have to ask permission to post a screenshot of the conversation. Hope this info helps!
It's not a problem with me. It's odd though that you had to add the original owner in order to dispute this suggestion. The buyer seemed so mad it seems like the best thing he could of done was shown proof the trade was MORE than the compare link, instead he tried to justify the price of 654 being similar to bots (rounded to 650 which is more odd than not showing proof)
I've already said that the suggestion is false to begin with. This suggestion is hilariously far from my sale and I hate the people who create these off of compare links that weren't refreshed in days or weeks. You can't see the full sale in them since keys were used on both ends before invs refreshed, go study some suggestions.
I despise all folk who price suggest unusuals anyways, ask about any of my past sales and I'll just block you, the current system sucks and if this passes that just proves my point. This has been a 1k hat for its entire lifespan, no one has ever gotten one of these even close to 650, me included.
Well if you don't want anyone asking about you're past sales without a block you can't expect mods to reject this suggestion. It's just your word vs the compare link lol
Ah yes, the sellers word, the buyers word, all the commenters words and common sense vs a non tracable sales compare link in a 0 passed suggestions andys suggestion.
31.05 - 04.06 and 02.06 - 05.06 compare links are a joke, no ones agreeing with you here for a reason. Last reply you'll get regarding this, time to wait 3 months for a mod to close this I guess.
Are you saying you have no proof you brought this more then 654? I'm pretty sure lying about an offer to manipulate a price suggestion can warrant a -rep
If the sale was more than 654, just drop a pic of trade history? Also its on mods to decide if this is an quicksell or not.
Out of principle I don't disclose past sales (bought and sold items) and I have no obligation to do so. You should decide the value of a hat you're buying yourself instead of relying on "values" based off of comparisons that could easily be either fabricated or outdated during the ever so rare inv refreshes like in this suggestion. You see some amount of keys/items left of the actual trade in it and now think "yeah, this must be all of it". Unless the compare link dates are max 2 days apart it should NEVER be accepted as valid proof period. The level of proof you're asking from me is a hundred times more proof than what the validity of the compare links in this and a ton of passed suggestions is. I refuse to support this system as the levels of proof accepted are far from being equal.
There's 2 buy orders at 600 keys, I've been offered/I've rejected a 900+ keys liquid offer (see the tag) and the sale is way more according to all individuals involved in it as well. If the mods want to pass a wrong suggestion against all common sense then that just proves my point that the system sucks. The whole pricing system is a vanity feature anyways, was it to disappear overnight nothing of value would be lost as it does more harm than good imho.
I understand what you are saying and its totally your decision to give your purchase data or not. But its kinda weird that you come into comments of an sugg, bash the system and dont provide any proof. You could have easily politely said that this compare is wrong/incomplete according to you as the buyer and you do not wish to provide your sale. Its true that due to difference in date the compare might be incomplete but rather than aurging with the suggestor who seems like sent you an offer before? and bashing each other in comments of an suggestion, that is not the right thing to do. Anyways it's mods decision to determine if the compare is imcomplete or not if you dont provide data.
Of course but all things considered this is clearly a personal "fuck you" suggestion. The dude has done 1 other horrible suggestion during all these years and he is perma banned for harassment in scraptf. He knows this suggestion is invalid, tried baiting a response with this "oo so you manipulate and it warrants -rep???" garbage and knows this shit will stay up for months on end.
Perma harassment ban dude with only 1 other rejected suggestion created in 4 years > 2 offers get rejected > creates a bad suggestion on the item right after > clearly wants this to stay up no matter what while baiting in comments with negative biased takes and deceptive wording. Make your own conclusion of this, I have nothing else to say, don't blame me for being annoyed at him for knowing his motive.
Lying warrants a -rep yeah. If you're mad about it don't lie lol
Stop rage commenting. This comment is false and dead to begin with ;)
I'm closing this there's been buyers at 600 for a while