there's no issue in making a suggestion for an item you own. Although I'm not sure whether the discount you used should affect the suggested price. I think it should be $250/$1.74 = ~145 keys, not 100% sure on this tho.
Thanks for the input! I don't do these often
And i'll wait for input from a pricemod regarding that then. But felt at least compelled including what i actually paid for it.
The discount should not be accounted for at all, as the seller still received the full value of the transaction (after mp tax, of course). It's also not reasonable to expect proof of all marketplace sales where the discount applies(there's no way to prove the discount was applied unless the buyer mentions it), but we appreciate you going out of your way to do so regardless.
Hope im doing this correctly
Only specific combo of gun/skin/wear/effect i could find through next.backpack.tf, if there's another feel free to update me on it
Also, if im not allowed to make this suggestion cause of conflict of interest/being the owner, someone else feel free to take the info below.
Item #1
https://backpack.tf/item/12684610292
Marketplace.tf sale:
US$225 on dec 7
Sale history: https://marketplace.tf/items/tf2/202;5;u703;w2;pk235;strange
Discount applied: https://imgur.com/a/okGYZFK
Avg key price was US$1.74
225/1.74 = ~129.3
Rounding to 130 keys
there's no issue in making a suggestion for an item you own. Although I'm not sure whether the discount you used should affect the suggested price. I think it should be $250/$1.74 = ~145 keys, not 100% sure on this tho.
Thanks for the input! I don't do these often
And i'll wait for input from a pricemod regarding that then. But felt at least compelled including what i actually paid for it.
The discount should not be accounted for at all, as the seller still received the full value of the transaction (after mp tax, of course). It's also not reasonable to expect proof of all marketplace sales where the discount applies(there's no way to prove the discount was applied unless the buyer mentions it), but we appreciate you going out of your way to do so regardless.
This should be resuggested at 145.
Alright, thank you for the clarification!
I'll close this one then.