- Forums
-
Pricing
- Community Pricing
- Pricegrid
- Spreadsheet
- Browse Suggestions
- Latest Changes
- Unusual Pricelist
- Browse by Item
- Browse by Effect
- Steam Community Market
- Market Pricelist
-
Trading
- Classifieds
- Classified Listings
- Utilities
- Calculator
- Premium Search
- Statistics
Item : https://backpack.tf/item/13654864651
Sale : https://backpack.tf/profiles/76561198125532261#!/compare/1703203200/1703376000
https://backpack.tf/profiles/76561198202487770#!/compare/1703203200/1703289600
Taunt : https://backpack.tf/stats/Unusual/Taunt%3A%20Kazotsky%20Kick/Tradable/Craftable/3131
Multiple buy orders @ 19 keys : https://imgur.com/aExcUBp
I was the seller and I sold the hat for 120 keys pure and a Snowfall Taunt: Kazotsky Kick
Honest, the comparison link does not show the keys, you must provide a full screenshot and show effects, otherwise it will be regarded as invalid evidence.
and you must explain where did 70 keys from and link it.
https://imgur.com/8S3Uinb
Consider downloading tampermonkey + this(https://naknak.net/tf2/historybastard/historybastard.user.js) so you can show proof more easily.
Vague screenshots will be regarded as invalid evidence, often.
can i literally just screen share with you at this point im literally trying everything
I am not a moderator. The evidence must be clearly displayed for the moderators to see, and you need to show the effects of the two items in the screenshots. Other people's sugg has nothing to do with me, honestly.
that's not possible from my understanding you can only show one items description (you can only over hoover over one item at a time, if there's a a way to do that in one screenshot lmk and ill provide it) i feel like im being to do a million and one things to just ADDon top of a previous price suggestion.
u can take 3 screenshots = =
https://backpack.tf/suggestion/6445f8120294a427af01a8ec
https://backpack.tf/suggestion/655b74fae55e534d82041408
https://imgur.com/a/T7TThPk
https://imgur.com/a/pBkeKw7
You bought the same day another nuke for 90 keys, would explain the high-end but there's still 10k missing.
Just bring a proper screenshot of the trade or this suggestion won't pass
how does a screenshot of the transaction not prove how many keys were used in a transaction ? isnt that the whole point ?
the fact that you can pull up the fact that i got another nuke the same day (few hours later on) why cant you simply pull up the other transaction ??!?!?! and no there isnt 10 keys missing recount the transaction/ screenshot or check my backpack history
if this was all the case the previous price suggestion should of NEVER been accepted why does the rules vary from person to person
Because 90+20+19=129, not 139.
So, if you could post a screenshot of the whole trade (you can try Ctrl+scroll down to get a better view of it on your browser, or using naknak extension with tamper monkey), it'll prove your high-end.
You're not trustable, as you said cash was added to the 70 keys sale but it wasn't in the last suggestion, so we won't trust your sayings until a valid proof is brought here...
where are you getting 90 + 20 + 19 ?? you just made up 20 keys out of the blue, and to answer Im not "trustable argument" if you are someone that has the ability to read, the previous post you can clearly see that that was my first post and i had even asked how i should of done it originally because im new to the whole price suggestion. i asked questions in 80% of that thread on what to do and how to do correctly the second time.....
my second point is that WASNT MY SUGGESTION, I have no control whether someone creates a price suggestion for an item they never owned at any point, nor is it my responsibility to provide that type of information if im not comfortable sharing that. the originally price suggestion (that i didnt make) never include ANY sory of screenshots for anything involved when it was first posted. So i guess the rules only apply to some people and to others it doesnt, which is news to me i didnt know we pick and choose who has to follow what rules on this fourms.
ive already posted a full screenshot of the whole trade... did you even read the thread?? ( https://imgur.com/8S3Uinb) your just borderline harrassing me at this point asking me for something i already provided
And you just ignore the U. Battin' a thousand added next to the Nuke
is that literally your only rebuttal to just making stuff up and not doing any math ?? its a two key (if its even 2 keys at that lol) taunt I gave him for giving me buy out it was never part of the original deal ( I had listed for 140 keys for a while)
my bad, NOT EVEN 2 KEYS lmao 1.62 keys (because this TOTALLY makes any sort of real difference)
https://imgur.com/a/fZ2KW5S
here is another screenshot because you'll probably ask me for another 37 screenshots
https://imgur.com/a/RPXjVhR
I've had two people add me today (and only today) coming from this thread and seeing it and apologizing on your guy's behave is which is wild because even they noticed how frustrated I am.
Since no one wants to do any sort of math or do any research on the suggestion in the first place ill do some simple math for you guys and prove more screenshots since you guys are refusing to do that
On Dec 23 i sold my nuke for 120 keys + 19 Key Taunt
later on that day i purchased a nuke for 90 keys
later on that day i purchased a Unusual Convict Cap (Blizzardy Storm) for 9 keys plus some ref (screenshots will be provided)
later on that same day i gifted the convict cap to JB (if you are a trader that is often on trade servers youll know who this is)
Proof : https://imgur.com/a/2EIDXwJ
THIS MATCHES PERFECTLY TO THE ORGINALLY BACKPACK COMPARISSON IN THE ORGINAL THREAD, but for some reason not a single person in this thread decided to do any sort of research before i was harassed with things that i have already provided ( is the reason why youll only see a NET of 21 keys plus the taunt after i bought a hat and then purchased the same hat for 90 keys later on)
i showed what you asked me for
where is this range coming from, if there is one sale there shouldn't be a range just the flat price of the item that was sold
the previous price suggestion is where the 70 keys come from
whatever happened to you claiming that the sale was for more than 70 https://backpack.tf/suggestion/654c790475d56c065200781a
that "price suggestion" wasn't mine and the suggestion is closed so there isn't anything I can do about that. But Either way it wouldn't make a difference or have an effect on this price suggestion
none of that is actually a response to what I'm talking about. you claim in the other suggestion that the sale was NOT for 70keys, and here you claim it actually was for 70keys
i was also told that this is an incorrect statement because id be wrong if i only put the price at 139 keys instead of showing the full range. (this is my understanding i could be wrong so please correct me if im wrong this is only my second price suggestion, first one being the exact same item only done incorrectly)
you made no mention of said transaction and where the 70 came from in your proof witch is why i made that comment, if i am not mistaken you still need to provide proof of that transaction in this even if it is the current price used for this item (someone correct me if i am wrong, and if i am i do apologize)
proof was already posted (via the previous price suggestion, which i didn't agree with if you go back and look) didn't see there being a point when the price suggestion was already approved (this was at least my thought process at the time)
if i am not mistaken you still need to provide a link to said price suggestion or put the proof they used here as from face value your pulling 70 outta no where
why do you keep saying out of nowhere its literally coming from the ONLY accepted price suggestion for this item
like i said and i quota " if i am not mistaken you still need to provide proof of that transaction in this even if it is the current price used for this item" so like i said if i am not mistaken (someone can correct me on this) you still need to link it/ mention it even if it seems blatantly obvious
At this point if someone else could make a new price suggestion for this item that would be great and id be able to provide any screenshots that im asked for. i copied someone's else format that got approved but im having a million issues with this one, tried to hop in on price suggestions on backpack as ive gotten really big into trading recently but obviously i cant seem to get one thing right.
Since no one wants to do any sort of math or do any research on the suggestion in the first place ill do some simple math for you guys and prove more screenshots since you guys are refusing to do that
On Dec 23 i sold my nuke for 120 keys + 19 Key Taunt
later on that day i purchased a nuke for 90 keys
later on that day i purchased a Unusual Convict Cap (Blizzardy Storm) for 9 keys plus some ref (screenshots will be provided)
later on that same day i gifted the convict cap to JB (if you are a trader that is often on trade servers youll know who this is)
Proof : https://imgur.com/a/2EIDXwJ
THIS MATCHES PERFECTLY TO THE ORGINALLY BACKPACK COMPARISSON IN THE ORGINAL THREAD, but for some reason not a single person in this thread decided to do any sort of research before i was harassed with things that i have already provided ( is the reason why youll only see a NET of 21 keys plus the taunt after i bought a hat and then purchased the same hat for 90 keys later on)
lucky these were the ONLY trades that happened on this day so its extremely easy to do some simple math and see that everything match perfectly to a tee, not sure why im being accused of being untrustworthy when i have provided everything required AND MORE on top of the fact that ive even offered to live stream the entire trade to anyone that wants any more proof and that offer still stands yet no one has even taken me up on that. for those that have asked for screenshots at the top of the thread you were 100% in the right and i provided those screenshots as asked, and contunie to provide more as i was told i was missing some information/things needed in the screenshot. everything after that point is just borderline harassment as everything needed tp prove the transaction was already provided.
at this point there is zero reason why this price suggestion shouldn't be accepted because everything that is need has already been provided and if you were going to go as far as checking every single persons backpack history everything matches correctly. but apparently nobody does any sort of research or attempts to do the correct math on this site so i dont think for a chance that it'll get accepted at this point. for those wondering why im typing as if im upset (im very upset and disappointed) because its frustrating to try to try something new and then when i prove all the necessary things im still told that im "untrusted" or that i haven't provided proof when the only accepted price check for this hat doesn't provide a single screenshot ( in the original post) or a quarter of all the evidence ive showed in this thread
Ok, so going to preface this by noting I have not read any of the comments. Listing sales below:
Item 1:
https://backpack.tf/item/13657648032
Sale 1:
https://backpack.tf/profiles/76561198000426108#!/compare/1703203200/1703289600
https://backpack.tf/profiles/76561198125532261#!/compare/1703203200/1703376000
Your purchase, 90 keys, right?
Sale 2:
https://backpack.tf/profiles/76561198125532261#!/compare/1713830400/1714089600
https://backpack.tf/profiles/76561198239564138#!/compare/1713916800/1714089600
Looks like you resold for 90 4 months later
Item 2:
https://backpack.tf/item/13654864651
Sale 3:
https://backpack.tf/profiles/76561198196427525#!/compare/1699401600/1699488000
https://backpack.tf/profiles/76561198125532261#!/compare/1699315200/1699401600
70 keys, sale from previous suggestion
Sale 4:
https://backpack.tf/profiles/76561198125532261#!/compare/1703203200/1703376000
https://backpack.tf/profiles/76561198202487770#!/compare/1703203200/1703289600
The 139 sale mentioned in the suggestion
Sale 5:
https://backpack.tf/profiles/76561198202487770#!/compare/1710979200/1711152000
https://backpack.tf/profiles/76561198802109924#!/compare/1710892800/1711152000
New sale, bulk
So we have sales at 70, 90 (x2), 139. I don't think 139 should be in the range when it took you 4 months to sell the second one, and you just took what you paid for it. 70 is a really old sale at this point, so I'd prefer 90 flat based on your most recent sale.
Please re-suggest this at 90 flat.
"Ok, so going to preface this by noting I have not read any of the comments. Listing sales below:"
Sorry, I didn't mean to be dismissive of your proof, it's just that suggestions with lots of back and forth comments like this tend to make things more confusing. Every sale here can be found via compare links, so I listed each sale with compares in my comment, which makes it clearer for both me reviewing and those viewing the suggestion in the future.
This needs to be re-suggested at 90 flat, otherwise I'll have to close this suggestion.
Closing. Feel free to re-suggest at 90 flat.