Price Suggestion
~232.5 keys
o.plnts
Unusual Brainiac Hairpiece Orbiting Planets
42 votes up
19 votes down
Advertisement
Related Suggestions

This suggestion was closed automatically because another price suggestion was accepted instead.

Comments can no longer be left on this suggestion.

Comments

3 instances to be inspected


mco.store sale [INVALID, IGNORING]

https://backpack.tf/item/2482608605


duped, item history is being funky (Spoke to owner and confirmed)

https://backpack.tf/item/1336560821


Only recent usable sale

https://backpack.tf/item/780958010

https://imgur.com/a/WZqs5AW

    I'd like to make it clear, this item is spelled. I am not sure if this affects the validity of the sale, but this is also the only recent usable movement..

      if it was voices I don’t think It would matter, but the sale used here is one with somewhat high-tier footprints so im not rly sure

      Considering that violet footprints are lower tier, and this price fits in a decent range with other planets miscs, I’m upvoting this.

        2 sellers (1 spelled) below suggested price.

          A seller listing an item for trade below a suggested price is irrelevant.. However, according to the item history it recently changed hands. Unfortunately the trade is untraceable- I can't seem to figure out what items were traded for it, if any..

            This statement is simply put not correct. Sellers below your suggested price (230 keys was the lower of the 2) heavily indicate that your suggested price is too high. Mods will tell you the same. If the lower listings sell, you will still need a range.


            The Sale Fire to Kush was probs this:

            https://backpack.tf/profiles/76561198063640894#!/compare/1719014400/1719100800

            150 pure + braniac + 40ish key unu + 20 key unu taunt for this: https://backpack.tf/item/3998342731

            which kush was selling for 700$ (~420 keys) on mp


            420-150-20-40= 210ish keys here, obviously heavily out of date on some stuff but should indicate that 275 is too high as well

              Thanks for helping me find it, I see what you are talking about. This level of clarity would have been more useful from the start, however.

              Whether or not this invalidates the suggestion, I will let moderation decide.