Most of the sales, even looking at the past 30 days, occur at this suggested range. 3.33 could be included, but it feels like a bit of a stretch. I prefer to stick closer to the 7-day data.
with basically 3 pages of sellers at 3.11 i think 3.22 is to high here
I saw your comment to that effect in the other suggestion. As I already stated, looking to do this wider range based on the new trial rule.
while a do agree we should have wider ranges for things it should also be relevant to the listings
having just under 3 pages of sellers of a price lower then your high-end should be a counter to it
while yes 3.22 has more bought and sold then 3.11 in the past 7 days but its not by much
if there was only 1 page of sellers at 3.11 i think it would be fine but having basically 3 pages of sellers should counter 3.22 regardless of this new trial rule
The point of the new rule is to for the suggested price to not just be a reflection of the immediate classifieds landscape, but to cover a range of time. And with the volume at which three-rune blades move at, ~3 pages can be cleared pretty quick.
not the best example but i believe it still works here
well the buyer at 3.22 is buying, I just sold him *(edit)two
with the amount of sellers at 3.11 and buyers and 3 and no buyers at 3.11 (currently) i think its safe to say they are an outlier even if they accept the trade
counter, trying a wider range per the new trial rule
https://gladiator.tf/sales?item=Three-Rune%20Blade&at=2024-08-23T16:56:07.580Z
Past 7 days
29+6 @ 3.22 ref
26+40 @ 3.11 ref
42 @ 3 ref
3 @ 2.88 ref
1 @ 2 ref
Most of the sales, even looking at the past 30 days, occur at this suggested range. 3.33 could be included, but it feels like a bit of a stretch. I prefer to stick closer to the 7-day data.
with basically 3 pages of sellers at 3.11 i think 3.22 is to high here
I saw your comment to that effect in the other suggestion. As I already stated, looking to do this wider range based on the new trial rule.
while a do agree we should have wider ranges for things it should also be relevant to the listings
having just under 3 pages of sellers of a price lower then your high-end should be a counter to it
while yes 3.22 has more bought and sold then 3.11 in the past 7 days but its not by much
if there was only 1 page of sellers at 3.11 i think it would be fine but having basically 3 pages of sellers should counter 3.22 regardless of this new trial rule
The point of the new rule is to for the suggested price to not just be a reflection of the immediate classifieds landscape, but to cover a range of time. And with the volume at which three-rune blades move at, ~3 pages can be cleared pretty quick.
https://backpack.tf/suggestion/66abd1c301c65f53800c4354
not the best example but i believe it still works here
well the buyer at 3.22 is buying, I just sold him *(edit)two
with the amount of sellers at 3.11 and buyers and 3 and no buyers at 3.11 (currently) i think its safe to say they are an outlier even if they accept the trade