hey cool hat

Seems like no sales on the pencil so buy orders are safe to go off. Definitely a deserved raise even though conservative.

Upvoting this solid suggestion, but please try to round to the nearest 50 keys as per the https://forums.backpack.tf/topic/6033-rules-for-unusual-price-suggestions/

Under normal circumstances, we do not accept suggestions that use a buyer for such a large portion of the trade. When they're small hats that won't be off by more than a few keys I'm fine with it since differences won't affect the range, but this might be as much as ~700 keys too low. That's a larger difference than the change induced here. In many cases, I would rather have an outdated value, than one that could severely overvalue or undervalue a hat.

However, there is one other factor to consider here. This is the only one in existence, and you are the current owner. We've had a few other situations where we were okay undervaluing hats if the only one(s) affected by it were okay with it.

Examples:

https://backpack.tf/suggestion/554d3a0bba8d88c0338b4571

https://backpack.tf/suggestion/5713c265c440452f4e19c0b2

In these cases, it would have been unpriced; in this case, it concerns a conservative raise. I'm willing to accept this as a similar exception to the normal rules.

Be wary that this does NOT mean that in other situations, it would also be okay to take such a large portion of a trade at buyers value. This is also because buyers are often unreliable and inconsistent. Another factor that weighed in here, is that the buyer has been there for the entire time at 650, and there's no clear over/undercutting war going on. In normal situations, it would still have been rejected, but because the buyer is stable AND it's the only current owner undervaluing their own hat with this suggestion, Im going to accept this as is.