Suggestion: Ravenous Ravens Frag Proof Fragger at 300 keys

Price Suggestion

~300 keys

ravenous ravens

41 votes up

11 votes down

This suggestion was accepted Fri, 03 Jan 25 14:11:00 +0000 by Vijf Kilo Boter (met voetjes).

Comments can no longer be left on this suggestion.

Comments

Sold with Cuban Smoke Frag Proof for 300 keys each

https://backpack.tf/profiles/76561198069302272#!/compare/1733097600/1733184000

https://imgur.com/a/mBi9u6u

Do you have any sort of evidence that both of you agreed on taking 300 for each one of the unusuals?

Wouldn't this be bulk, Explocivo808?

This was quoted from Easy Peasy Lemon Squeezy on my Green Confetti Bonk Boy price suggestion earlier this year: "The sale being used here is actually bulk, as the Green Confetti is 50% of the total trade."

Cited from my Green Confetti Bonk Boy price suggestion at 170 Keys - https://backpack.tf/suggestion/65c05bd2e70fc8646507cccf

Well in the case of your suggestion there was not a stated price at which both items were taken at and instead you relied on the suggested price of one of them, if you provided a screenshot with proof that both the seller and buyer agreed on a price then it would had been good!

Here is proof this trade was made as a bulk trade. I had these items previously listed for around 300-400 keys each

https://imgur.com/a/tTIIpHU

I mean idk it's bulk it shouldn't be used but hey I mean at least you clarified it proct

I mean I paid 340 keys for 2 unusual bonk boys. And we both parties agreed at 170 keys each so that was my process on it. Unfortunately I couldn't protest it

In cases like this, where these are the only sales we have, I'm fine accepting a split like this in cases where either the buyer simply pays the BO of 2 hats (would always be fine) or if the hats are evenly split with confirmation from buyer or seller.

This means the 50:50 split (or possibly an agreed upon split, although I'd be extremely hesitant with that) needs to be reasonable, i.e. if someone sells a nuts and bolts heavy duty rag and a burning flames pyros beanie for 100 keys, then obviously stating it was 50 for both does not work.

In this case, it is evident both were listed at similar prices, and nothing to suspect either hat should be worth significantly more than the other. With this in mind, I think this is fine.

I also think the bonk case would have been fine. I think there, the implication that one of the bonks was simply taken at their bp price was the reason that that ended up getting rejected. In these circumstances, I'd only allow it if they're the only sales on items, and if both are being priced.