Item Snapshot made
Classifieds
101.01 keys
Unique Catastrophic Companions 19 Trade-Up A Distinctive Lack of Hue 15714723265 14159913583101.01 keys
Unique Catastrophic Companions 57 Trade-Up Pink as Hell 15665839361 13570903579101.01 keys
Unique Catastrophic Companions 23 Found in Crate 15683433517 7883919567101.01 keys
Unique Catastrophic Companions 44 Found in Crate 15687452321 4270075561101.66 keys
Unique Catastrophic Companions 75 Trade-Up A Distinctive Lack of Hue 15741549602 7923167331103 keys
Unique Catastrophic Companions 84 Trade-Up Balaclavas Are Forever 15719671702 15612408600106 keys
Unique Catastrophic Companions 84 Found in Crate A Distinctive Lack of Hue 15546979872 8489918663108 keys
Unique Catastrophic Companions 5 Found in Crate 15211835735 4806071622110 keys
Unique Catastrophic Companions 70 Found in Crate Mann Co. Orange 15498350959 6933097841110 keys
Unique Catastrophic Companions 97 Found in Crate Pink as Hell 15608680273 1246517909699.46 keys
Unique Catastrophic Companions99.02 keys
Unique Catastrophic Companions spells99 keys
Unique Catastrophic Companions97 keys
Unique Catastrophic Companions97 keys
Unique Catastrophic Companions Aged Moustache Grey96 keys
Unique Catastrophic Companions96 keys
Unique Catastrophic Companions96 keys
Unique Catastrophic Companions93 keys
Unique Catastrophic Companions93 keys
Unique Catastrophic Companions
https://gladiator.tf/sales?item=Catastrophic%20Companions&at=2025-05-17T10:53:25.288Z
Sales past month
Apr 2025
104 keys - 2 sold
99 - bought
May 2025
~99 keys - 2 bought
classies - https://postimg.cc/jD3SqVsj
Taking 99 flat, the only usable sales
I just paid 100 for one of these last week. I can’t get to the screenshot now but I’ll take one later today
buy orders are higher than the sugg price, so this is irrelevant:/
https://gladiator.tf/sales?item=Catastrophic%20Companions&at=2025-05-23T19:12:14.751Z New sale at 100 Keys
The 96 Key sale is also valid, but the 104 Key sales are not since they are outdated.
Resuggest at 96-100.
Isn't that new sale 101?
You're right, actually. I missed the 64 ref.
96-101 in that case, then.