Comments can no longer be left on this suggestion.
Comments
First time suggester, so let me know if I'm doing things wrong here, or what can be done better, et cetera.
Anyway, Voodoo-Cursed Scout Soul liquidity is fairly low. Appears to be a consensus trading around the 1 key range with low spread. Trade volume is notably higher on higher value exchanges when trades are made. Low and high values affixed to areas with the highest volume and their associated price point. Suggested values rounded per BPTF rules.
To respond, if an item is selling in keys you should be pricing in keys. This skirts the edge, but regardless valuing keys at 52.33 because most of the top-paying buyers were at that isn't a solid move as they flux a lot. In the 2 hours since I left my comment in your other suggestion, buyers are now 2 scrap higher.
I appreciate the input. I wasn't entirely sure if it should be in full ref or fractional keys given that the item seems to float in-between the two. I thought about it and figured the key valuation made the most sense given that trades are made exchanging the key regardless of current ref value of the key. On top of the largest sum purchases being around the key mark. Was my logic anyway.
none of the sales mentioned round to 1.05 keys
I appreciate your input, also knowing you are one of the people in charge here. Would I round up or round down when making price suggestions? BPTF listings are 1.02, but rules say to round to the nearest .05 keys. 28 sales slightly above a key match the current listing range. Unless this would've made more sense to value in refined. Anyway, feel free to let me know or inform me or all that. Trying to get a feel for it.
price ranges should be based on sales and with the sales you've mentioned these would round to 1 key when rounded to the nearest 0.05 keys
as current sellers/buyers and a large portion of recent sales are in keys i'd say pricing this in keys is fine rather than refined
Thank you! It means a lot that you'd help me figure this out. I'll keep that in mind for any future price suggestions I end up making. Wish I'd have done this one right the first time (second really) but I suppose at least I know now.
you can close this one yourself and re-suggest with the necessary corrections
First time suggester, so let me know if I'm doing things wrong here, or what can be done better, et cetera.
Anyway, Voodoo-Cursed Scout Soul liquidity is fairly low. Appears to be a consensus trading around the 1 key range with low spread. Trade volume is notably higher on higher value exchanges when trades are made. Low and high values affixed to areas with the highest volume and their associated price point. Suggested values rounded per BPTF rules.
https://gladiator.tf/sales?item=Voodoo-Cursed%20Scout%20Soul&at=2025-08-26T23:41:39.373Z
----------SOLD PAST 30 DAYS----------
1 @ 60 ref
1 @ 52.44 ref
1 @ 52 ref
3 @ 1 key
1 @ 51.22 ref
1 @ 50 ref
2 @ 49.77 ref
1 @ 49.44 ref
2 @ 49.33 ref
1 @ 47.55 ref
1 @ 46 ref
1 @ 42.11 ref
----------BOUGHT PAST 30 DAYS----------
18 @ 1 key 0.33 ref
10 @ 1 key 0.22 ref
4 @ 1 key 0.11 ref
8 @ 1 key
2 @ 51.44 ref
2 @ 51.22 ref
12 @ 50.33 ref
2 @ 50.22 ref
2 @ 50.11 ref
2 @ 48 ref
2 @ 47.88 ref
2 @ 43.88 ref
2 @ 40 ref
4 @ 35 ref
2 @ 34 ref
2 @ 31.11 ref
4 @ 31 ref
To respond, if an item is selling in keys you should be pricing in keys. This skirts the edge, but regardless valuing keys at 52.33 because most of the top-paying buyers were at that isn't a solid move as they flux a lot. In the 2 hours since I left my comment in your other suggestion, buyers are now 2 scrap higher.
I appreciate the input. I wasn't entirely sure if it should be in full ref or fractional keys given that the item seems to float in-between the two. I thought about it and figured the key valuation made the most sense given that trades are made exchanging the key regardless of current ref value of the key. On top of the largest sum purchases being around the key mark. Was my logic anyway.
none of the sales mentioned round to 1.05 keys
I appreciate your input, also knowing you are one of the people in charge here. Would I round up or round down when making price suggestions? BPTF listings are 1.02, but rules say to round to the nearest .05 keys. 28 sales slightly above a key match the current listing range. Unless this would've made more sense to value in refined. Anyway, feel free to let me know or inform me or all that. Trying to get a feel for it.
price ranges should be based on sales and with the sales you've mentioned these would round to 1 key when rounded to the nearest 0.05 keys
as current sellers/buyers and a large portion of recent sales are in keys i'd say pricing this in keys is fine rather than refined
Thank you! It means a lot that you'd help me figure this out. I'll keep that in mind for any future price suggestions I end up making. Wish I'd have done this one right the first time (second really) but I suppose at least I know now.
you can close this one yourself and re-suggest with the necessary corrections
You got it. I'll get back to it soon.