- Forums
-
Pricing
- Community Pricing
- Pricegrid
- Spreadsheet
- Browse Suggestions
- Latest Changes
- Unusual Pricelist
- Browse by Item
- Browse by Effect
- Steam Community Market
- Market Pricelist
-
Trading
- Classifieds
- Classified Listings
- Utilities
- Calculator
- Premium Search
- Statistics
https://backpack.tf/item/14241981982
https://backpack.tf/profiles/76561199085308746#!/compare/1756857600/1756944000
https://backpack.tf/profiles/76561198091772641#!/compare/1756857600/1756944000
16129423120
80 keys 49 ref 3 rec
https://ibb.co/hxM2TcRd
https://ibb.co/SwpjwYFL
81
I personally would disagree with the value at 81 as the purchaser for the following reasons.
1. This unusual was bought as a quicksell that was likely listed automatically from a bot. It was only listed for two days before I swooped it up, if I remember correctly.
2. Other effects often held at lower values are listed higher than the suggested price.
- https://backpack.tf/stats/Unusual/Dapper%20Dickens/Tradable/Craftable/59 (aces high listed @80)
- https://backpack.tf/stats/Unusual/Dapper%20Dickens/Tradable/Craftable/12 (massed flies listed @84 and 100)
- Plenty of other examples that are less outstanding if you have a look at current classified.
3. Given that both previous sales were at 95 and the hat is still 1/2, I feel there is very little reason to suggest that it's value would suddenly drop by such a large margin from one single bot sale.
Because of this, I feel that the current value of 95 is more accurate. Do take this comment with a grain of salt as I'm unfamiliar with the rules regarding this price suggestion meta. Thanks for hearing me out, and I'm happy to get feedback if I'm wrong!
It’s been listed at 85 for over a month, got dumped to bots for 60-80 multiple times, listed on STN 5 months straight, zero interest in this hat, and the person who paid 95 just dumped hat to bot, clearly, even he didn’t think it was worth that much. So I’m sure the moderators will back me up, 95 is simply too high. Plus, you can’t use other effects as a reference for pricing a hat. “I'm unfamiliar with the rules regarding this price suggestion meta.” Next time, try reading the rules first: https://backpack.tf/help/suggestions
This is some of the evidence I was able to collect. After all, I might not be remembering it correct:
https://backpack.tf/item/14241981982
https://backpack.tf/suggestion/668dc4d6842ff3cf3d087b5e
SCM sale @ 95 keys
https://backpack.tf/profiles/76561198035547951#!/compare/1726963200/1727049600
https://backpack.tf/profiles/76561199581722058#!/compare/1726963200/1727049600
Owner who paid 95 keys dumped for 89 keys
https://backpack.tf/profiles/76561198074241821#!/compare/1739750400/1740096000
https://backpack.tf/profiles/76561198439498211#!/compare/1739664000/1739750400
sold for 85 keys
https://backpack.tf/profiles/76561198439498211#!/compare/1743465600/1743552000
https://backpack.tf/profiles/76561199516139105#!/compare/1743465600/1743552000
bulk to Morning Glory Frontier Djustice, not important.
https://backpack.tf/profiles/76561199207750538#!/compare/1748390400/1748563200
https://backpack.tf/profiles/76561199085308746#!/compare/1748304000/1748390400
47 keys, it’s even below what I remember the listing being
Since 4 trades are clearly below 95, your argument doesn’t hold any ground.
The sequence 95 ⮕89 ⮕85 ⮕47⮕81 shows a steady decline in price (even 47 is an outlier), which means 81 is not an outlier.