This suggestion was marked as bad price range and closed
by Blaze.xTH3RM4Lx.
The price range was either too broad or did not accurately reflect how the item was traded.
Therefore, this suggestion has been closed.
Comments can no longer be left on this suggestion.
Comments
First price suggestion ever, feedback is appreciated - price seems to have dramatically fallen, 30 day stats include the previous common price. The few listings for 1 scrap have been humans, other than that most listings have been bots buying/selling for 2-2.5 scrap a crate.
(also I don't know why but I can't set a high value of 0.27, as it automatically rounds to 0.33)
0.22 ref flat doesn't look representative. It can be argued that 0.77 and 1 aren't consistent enough to be in the range but 0.66 should at least be included since there are over 2000 sales at that value in the past month. I would go with 0.22-0.66 ref
you must provide a permanent link to use gladiator tf stats as proof
this looks like it should have a range, not a flat price. you're showing ~3.5k sales at 0.33 so not sure how you landed on trying 0.27
I was looking at the weekly prices, is that a bit too volatile?
Price suggestions for non-unusuals are supposed to cover the most common trading points regarding sales from the past month. In this case, 0.22 and 0.66 are clearly the most common trading points
I see - I thought the 0.66 trading point could be overlooked as the case was still new to the market, considering this time last month was 18/10/2025, or 9 days into Scream Fortress XVII.
best to go with a range here given the number of sales. a flat value doesn't seem to make that much sense.
First price suggestion ever, feedback is appreciated - price seems to have dramatically fallen, 30 day stats include the previous common price. The few listings for 1 scrap have been humans, other than that most listings have been bots buying/selling for 2-2.5 scrap a crate.
(also I don't know why but I can't set a high value of 0.27, as it automatically rounds to 0.33)
Past 24 hours
83 @ 0.22 ref
Past 7 days
732 @ 0.22 ref
Past 30 days
10 @ 0.77 ref
2738 @ 0.66 ref
1528 @ 0.55 ref
394 @ 0.44 ref
3488 @ 0.33 ref
292 @ 0.27 ref
2452 @ 0.22 ref
4 @ 0.05 ref
You need to include the Gladiator.tf stats https://gladiator.tf/sales?item=Spectral%20Stash%20Case%20%23149&at=2025-11-18T10:38:57.483Z
0.22 ref flat doesn't look representative. It can be argued that 0.77 and 1 aren't consistent enough to be in the range but 0.66 should at least be included since there are over 2000 sales at that value in the past month. I would go with 0.22-0.66 ref
you must provide a permanent link to use gladiator tf stats as proof
this looks like it should have a range, not a flat price. you're showing ~3.5k sales at 0.33 so not sure how you landed on trying 0.27
I was looking at the weekly prices, is that a bit too volatile?
Price suggestions for non-unusuals are supposed to cover the most common trading points regarding sales from the past month. In this case, 0.22 and 0.66 are clearly the most common trading points
I see - I thought the 0.66 trading point could be overlooked as the case was still new to the market, considering this time last month was 18/10/2025, or 9 days into Scream Fortress XVII.
best to go with a range here given the number of sales. a flat value doesn't seem to make that much sense.
0.22 - 0.66 would be better here for now