Suggestion: Spellbound War Pig at 8106 keys

Price Suggestion

~7750 keys

spellbnd

43 votes up

6 votes down

Related Suggestions

This suggestion was closed Wed, 04 Mar 26 23:22:43 +0000 by the submitter.

Comments can no longer be left on this suggestion.

Comments

https://backpack.tf/profiles/76561198085861958#!/compare/1764806400/1764892800

https://gyazo.com/e7a5113889ad0753a3ad701adef39668

https://gyazo.com/c3f7ddc660a1e75500652a8ab83ad6f1

2 golden pans (7706) + 200 keys + 200 key downpayment 1 month prior

https://gyazo.com/f55158f375c5e3377b2dbe74d497307f

"pure sales shouldn't be rounded"

The double-spelled variant current owner is probably laughing hysterically rn, knowing the unspelled variant is selling 1.6x more than the double-spelled one did a few+ years back 😭

Congratulations to the new owner. You are now a War Pig!

So dumb lol

8106... another pure evil creature

If you round pure sales you’re not following Headmaster Shuffle’s advice

how sales which include gpan now being pure?

eh close enough. there's gotta be some way to count trades that would exceed the inventory limit as pure

you still can do deals via middleman/move items to scm for more space. so inventory limit not justification

"While many people may view a Pan as pure, it's intrinsically not pure"

-Shuffle

This was a decision I made… but when you see how much I pay for the next warpig you’re gonna really lose it.

Also good lord round that horrendous number 😂

Going to put it into bullet points for simplicity's sake:

This sale occurred on December 5th
This sale uses the old Gold Frying Pan's price, which was submitted September 7th
The new Gold Frying Pan suggestion was submitted December 23rd, and uses sales from the prior 2 months (October 23rd - December 23rd)

With this in mind, I feel it'd be better to use the newer pan price (3675), and take 7750.

As a side note, while golden frying pans are usually a substitute for pure due to backpack space limitations (this trade in particular not being an exception), I don't think it we should be rounding in situations like this, as the pan's price was near outdated and uncertain at the time of the trade. The current pan's price is also rounded, also by the same amount as here, which doesn't help the argument of not rounding a "pure" sale here (though the pan price you're basing this suggestion off is infact not rounded, i'll give you that).

While I agree in theory with this, in practice I suggested something with indate minis and it has sat open for nearly three months. Rounding should not be a reason to reject this, nor should an updated mini - 7750 may be slightly more accurate if I am being a purist about the exact value at the time but pans were 3853 indate when I suggested and taking a quick look at sales now they're back at that price point as well. Resuggesting over a ~150 key difference which is less than 2% of the price of this item seems pedantic

an updated mini is more than enough reason to resuggest. the overly specific price also doesn't help. a ~350* key difference absolutely isn't something to scoff over, no matter the percentage of value that works out to be. if you feel the pan price is now too low, you're more than welcome to update that again, but from what i've seen, recent suggestions using the current price haven't been having any issues.

None of the sales from that original Pan suggestion were in-date when the War Pig sale occurred, so the newer price for the Pan should be used here.