- Forums
-
Pricing
- Community Pricing
- Pricegrid
- Spreadsheet
- Browse Suggestions
- Latest Changes
- Unusual Pricelist
- Browse by Item
- Browse by Effect
- Steam Community Market
- Market Pricelist
-
Trading
- Classifieds
- Classified Listings
- Utilities
- Calculator
- Premium Search
- Statistics
Sup!
1 of 2, One has never moved only one to ever move is the spelled one.
1 sale in the last 3 months
280 pure from me 28/12/2025
https://backpack.tf/profiles/76561198164814063#!/compare/1766707200/1766880000
https://imgbox.com/6UdRW6Ng
-Goo
I love seeing god tiers get the price they deserve.
tf2 trading is so mossed up people think a boot with kooky eyes is a godtier
Either my irony is lost on you or you agree with my original statement lmao
I can see mods have commented on here with their hidden ones but wanted to put my 2 cents in.
Though this is spelled and the other isn't I still think this should be accepted. The other owner is very unlucky to sell their one as its apart of a personal collection. This is the only recent one to have moment and is likely to the one which will move again in the future.
I rather have this accepted to more accurately reflect the price of an actively moving item epsecially since this is outdated by 5 years. Also in this case its 1 of 2 the spelled item while yes it would be valued more but in reality the value wouldn't increase that much considering the other is very unlikely to move.
Hi mods, yeah up to you guys at the end of the day
So what’s the point in having this be open for 3 months? By the time this will get accepted (which it will since it always does), this original sale wouldn’t even be in date anymore
Just gonna wait it out, i think the mods should of accepted it months back but if the backlog is that bad then sure it can sit here until they make a decision
i have a time warp double spelled boot and nonspelled got it priced at 200 so i wouldnt say this is anything crazy of a update in price and should go through
For what it's worth, the last suggestion was priced off the spelled one. Granted this was before a discrepancy between spelled and non-spelled unusuals formed, so while I am personally not a fan of pricing items with spelled sales unless only spelled copies exist, this is, by the rules, valid.
Fun unrelated fact: mine is also duped, if i remember correctly. Doesn't show up as the other copy hasn't been scanned since the great history wipe.
revisiting this since i misremembered the rules, the last suggestion would have to have been within the last year, so my point of the suggestion being valid isn't right, sorry for the mis-info.
given my re-read of the rules, it does seem structured in such a way that raising the price off of a spelled copy when non-spelled exist can only ever be done if a spelled copy of an unusual was dumped to a non-spelled buy order, or the last suggestion was priced off a spelled one, within the last year specifically, which just makes most spelled sales invalid, including this one. given how unfeasible this would be in a few cases, it's likely mods aren't necessarily trying to see if this price will hold up, but are rather reconsidering the ruling on spelled sales for unusuals as a whole, as a decision here will affect how suggestions like this go on from now on, hence the hold-up.
The current wording of the rules would make this suggestion accurate. If we go through each bullet:
- "The sale was to a buy order seeking non-spelled variants..." - it wasn't
- "The most recent price suggestion, if once exists within the last year..." - one doesn't
- "There are no sales (that aren't outliers) nor relevant sellers of a non-spelled variant for demonstrably less in the last year" - true
- "If the most recent price suggestion was within the last year and raised the price based off a spelled sale, and you're looking to raise the price again with a spelled sale, the owners of the non-spelled variants have not had any major sales for the past year or are trade banned / unable to trade."
The last point originally stated the non-spelled owners couldn't have recent, major sales in general, but an edit in December 2025 amended that to specify the non-spelled owners' activity was only relevant if the item's price was already raised from a spelled sale in the last year which isn't the case here.
waiting with this sitting on front page feels like watching paint dry - 3 months to reject or accept a 1;2 x.x
chicken sandwich
4 MONTHS!!!