- Forums
-
Pricing
- Community Pricing
- Pricegrid
- Spreadsheet
- Browse Suggestions
- Latest Changes
- Unusual Pricelist
- Browse by Item
- Browse by Effect
- Steam Community Market
- Market Pricelist
-
Trading
- Classifieds
- Classified Listings
- Utilities
- Calculator
- Premium Search
- Statistics
https://backpack.tf/item/11837442770
https://marketplace.tf/items/tf2/31257;5;u17
Feb 25, 2026 - $34.99
34.99/1.88 = 18.6 keys
https://gladiator.tf/sales?item=Sunbeams%20Festive%20Cover-Up&at=2026-03-01T08:21:20.541Z
Sold to bot buy order for 14 keys 33.88 ref
Rounding to 19
If the person who paid 19 dumped it for less afterwards it would be better to wait for more sales
it's 4 keys less, unc
Even though it doesn't feel like much, it still means that they didn't see it as being worth 19 keys in the end, especially considering the fact that the dump only happened 3 days after
mannc*.store has a sale 2025-11-21
32.99/1.75 = 18.85
My conscience is clear
that's too old and not a valid source of proof
*hits hammer on desk repeatedly* We are having a re-trial.
Under the Fifth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, no person shall be deprived of life, liberty, or property without due process of law.
Does the bot owner (sunny witch) not deserve to have their hard work of renting and supplying five (5) trading bots with a constant supply of keys, rewarded?
What about the feelings of Sunbeams Festive Cover-Up, do they not deserve to have a price, despite being bought at least four times over the years?
What of the 13 other owners of such property, must they have an unpriced hat, when they fairly unboxed or traded for it?
It's best to wait for new sales. Closing.