Considering anything above 1.61 an outlier due to lack of sales and several unsolds for less and some for over a month.
Going with 1.33 - 1.55 ref
Eh, I don't think the point for excluding is as strong here. The 1.61 sale can also be interpreted as 1.66, and the 1.77 sale does support those lower sales.
I think 1.33-1.66 is fine here.
I still think 1.66 is to high, we are basing it on mainly 3 sales at that point and 1.77 supporting the higher.
Even with 1.61, 1.66 and 1.77 added together it its still like x6 times the amount of sales compared to the next highest. Not to mention the over page and a half unsold for 1.55 (some for over a month)
There is also sellers at 1.66 which are over 2 months.
I know unsolds don't really mean as much as they use to but given the several unsolds and the length of time they are unsold for (especially the 1.66 ones being over 2 months) I still think it can be classified as an outlier.
The length of an unsold is meaningless for non-unusuals as it doesn't account for bots that stock multiple of the same item. The only ones that raise an eyebrow are the ones that only have a stock of 1, which to be fair there are a couple instances here.
Really, the thing you need to account for the most when it comes to unsolds is the fact that bots can (and will) change their mind at the blink of an eye. There's been many cases where bots are unsold at let's say, 11 ref for example, only for all of them to collectively lower their price to 9 ref an hour later. This is why bot listings are not reliable counter-proof alone.
Gladiator.tf
Sold in the past 30 days
1 @ 1.77 ref
1 @ 1.61 ref
8 @ 1.55 ref
5 @ 1.44 ref
Bought in the past 30 days
2 @ 1.66 ref
16 @ 1.55 ref
4 @ 1.5 ref
12 @ 1.44 ref
16 @ 1.33 ref
Considering anything above 1.61 an outlier due to lack of sales and several unsolds for less and some for over a month.
Going with 1.33 - 1.55 ref
Eh, I don't think the point for excluding is as strong here. The 1.61 sale can also be interpreted as 1.66, and the 1.77 sale does support those lower sales.
I think 1.33-1.66 is fine here.
I still think 1.66 is to high, we are basing it on mainly 3 sales at that point and 1.77 supporting the higher.
Even with 1.61, 1.66 and 1.77 added together it its still like x6 times the amount of sales compared to the next highest. Not to mention the over page and a half unsold for 1.55 (some for over a month)
There is also sellers at 1.66 which are over 2 months.
I know unsolds don't really mean as much as they use to but given the several unsolds and the length of time they are unsold for (especially the 1.66 ones being over 2 months) I still think it can be classified as an outlier.
The length of an unsold is meaningless for non-unusuals as it doesn't account for bots that stock multiple of the same item. The only ones that raise an eyebrow are the ones that only have a stock of 1, which to be fair there are a couple instances here.
Really, the thing you need to account for the most when it comes to unsolds is the fact that bots can (and will) change their mind at the blink of an eye. There's been many cases where bots are unsold at let's say, 11 ref for example, only for all of them to collectively lower their price to 9 ref an hour later. This is why bot listings are not reliable counter-proof alone.
Having given the gladiator snapshots a closer look though, I do think I agree that 1.66 is an outlier in retrospect. All of the 1.66 sales used here are relatively old, which means this will be fine in a few days anyway: https://gladiator.tf/sales?item=Marshall%27s%20Mutton%20Chops&at=2026-03-28T04:12:17.893Z