Additionally, every sale you provided is outdated, with the exception of this one:
3.66 ref @ 3/28/2026, 11:59 AM
Item History
Trade Partner
Current sellers are at 3-3.11 refined, which are lower than this sale. While listings don't counter individual data points, seller listings cannot be lower than every single valid sale provided. This cannot be updated currently until we either get more sales, or until bot listings stabilize.
Hi, thanks again for the clarification and for the permanent Gladiator link — I appreciate you taking the time to include that.
I do want to stand by my original point regarding the sales. The ones I provided are the most recent available data points, so they aren’t outdated from a data perspective. While I understand that current seller listing are sitting on 3.11 refined, but 1 listing alone don’t invalidate actual recorded sales.
Additionally, if we look at other marketplaces like marketplace.tf / marco.store, the item is currently selling for about €0.19, which is roughly ~6 refined. That further shows there’s still variance depending on the platform and doesn’t strictly support lowering the value based purely on current backpack.tf listings.
Given this, I still believe the data used is valid and supports my current price. The existing sales justify the value, and I don’t see sufficient evidence to lower it based solely on current listings.
I agree with your closing statement, which is why I said that this cannot be updated currently. The problem is that we have a hard cut-off regarding non-unusual sales of 30 days, as using anything after that would add way too much variance. Exceptions can be granted for glitched or other kinds of collectors items, but this is not one of those cases. You only have a single valid sale, which is countered by not one, but two lower bot listings.
I'll also address the point of Marketplace sales, those largely go unused due to the fact that they are generally much higher relative to classifieds listings on average. I'd advise against using Marketplace sales unless there's zero usable sales on Gladiator, which is not the case here either. The same logic can apply to SCM sales to a lesser extent.
Mar 2026
3.66 ref @ 3/28/2026, 05:59 PM
3.22 ref @ 3/10/2026, 11:56 PM
3.22 ref @ 3/10/2026, 01:24 AM
3.22 ref @ 3/4/2026, 10:25 PM
3.44 ref @ 3/3/2026, 06:32 PM
Feb 2026
4.88 ref @ 2/26/2026, 12:17 PM
3.44 ref @ 2/10/2026, 10:11 AM
3.44 ref @ 2/10/2026, 10:10 AM
https://gladiator.tf/sales?item=Strange%20Constructor%27s%20Cover
Please re-read the non-unusual suggestion rules: https://forums.backpack.tf/topic/36705-rules-for-non-unusual-suggestions/
Your gladiator link needs to be a PERMANENT link, that can be obtained while scrolling below in the aforementioned page. For example: https://gladiator.tf/sales?item=Strange%20Constructor%27s%20Cover&at=2026-04-14T15:41:47.944Z
Additionally, every sale you provided is outdated, with the exception of this one:
3.66 ref @ 3/28/2026, 11:59 AM
Item History
Trade Partner
Current sellers are at 3-3.11 refined, which are lower than this sale. While listings don't counter individual data points, seller listings cannot be lower than every single valid sale provided. This cannot be updated currently until we either get more sales, or until bot listings stabilize.
Hi, thanks again for the clarification and for the permanent Gladiator link — I appreciate you taking the time to include that.
I do want to stand by my original point regarding the sales. The ones I provided are the most recent available data points, so they aren’t outdated from a data perspective. While I understand that current seller listing are sitting on 3.11 refined, but 1 listing alone don’t invalidate actual recorded sales.
Additionally, if we look at other marketplaces like marketplace.tf / marco.store, the item is currently selling for about €0.19, which is roughly ~6 refined. That further shows there’s still variance depending on the platform and doesn’t strictly support lowering the value based purely on current backpack.tf listings.
Given this, I still believe the data used is valid and supports my current price. The existing sales justify the value, and I don’t see sufficient evidence to lower it based solely on current listings.
I agree with your closing statement, which is why I said that this cannot be updated currently. The problem is that we have a hard cut-off regarding non-unusual sales of 30 days, as using anything after that would add way too much variance. Exceptions can be granted for glitched or other kinds of collectors items, but this is not one of those cases. You only have a single valid sale, which is countered by not one, but two lower bot listings.
I'll also address the point of Marketplace sales, those largely go unused due to the fact that they are generally much higher relative to classifieds listings on average. I'd advise against using Marketplace sales unless there's zero usable sales on Gladiator, which is not the case here either. The same logic can apply to SCM sales to a lesser extent.