It's better to stratify them to have an easier visualization (with a familiar Gladiator stats look) with 0.05-key increments: (rounding to the closest scrap)
2 @ 0.6 key
1 @ 0.65 key
13 @ 0.7 key
13 @ 0.75 key
22 @ 0.8 key (~45.77 ref)
25 @ 0.85 key (~48.66 ref)
7 @ 0.9 key (~51.44 ref)
10 @ 0.95 key
Given the left-skewed dataset at 0.8+ keys and 10 sales near 0.95 key, it doesn't seem unreasonable to set the range higher and capped at the max sale (55.36 ref -> 55.33 ref); the lower end would be set by the lowest Gladiator sale at 34.22 ref.
Taking 34.22-55.33
It's better to solely use Gladiator sales if you have those available instead of trying to include Marketplace and SCM sales, as those tend to be overpriced generally speaking. You can see that this is the case because every classifieds unsold counters your high end, which is being made unnecessarily wide.
Gladiator
1 key = 57.22 ref
Sales
45.11 ref @ 6/8/2026, 06:45 PM
39.44 ref @ 6/8/2026, 03:25 PM
Purchases
41.33 ref @ 6/22/2026, 12:33 AM
34.22 ref @ 6/16/2026, 01:44 AM
40.66 ref @ 6/5/2026, 12:40 AM
SCM sales
n=94 since May 29, 2026, 1400 +0000 GMT; a strong case to use them for additional data support
Raw data for Key sales | S. Tuxxy sales
Min: 0.0135 key (Jun 11 13:00)<--- extreme outlier, droppedMin: 0.6068 key (Jun 02 10:00) = 34.72 ref
Max: 0.9675 key (Jun 03 11:00) = 55.36 ref
Mean 0.8023, median 0.8165
It's better to stratify them to have an easier visualization (with a familiar Gladiator stats look) with 0.05-key increments: (rounding to the closest scrap)
2 @ 0.6 key
1 @ 0.65 key
13 @ 0.7 key
13 @ 0.75 key
22 @ 0.8 key (~45.77 ref)
25 @ 0.85 key (~48.66 ref)
7 @ 0.9 key (~51.44 ref)
10 @ 0.95 key
Given the left-skewed dataset at 0.8+ keys and 10 sales near 0.95 key, it doesn't seem unreasonable to set the range higher and capped at the max sale (55.36 ref -> 55.33 ref); the lower end would be set by the lowest Gladiator sale at 34.22 ref.
Taking 34.22-55.33
It's better to solely use Gladiator sales if you have those available instead of trying to include Marketplace and SCM sales, as those tend to be overpriced generally speaking. You can see that this is the case because every classifieds unsold counters your high end, which is being made unnecessarily wide.
34.22-45.11 will be more appropriate here.