Suggestion: Showstopper Taunt: Cheers! at 10 keys

Price Suggestion

~11 keys

showstopper

43 votes up

3 votes down

Related Suggestions

This suggestion was closed Thu, 16 Jul 26 14:38:35 +0000 by the submitter.

Comments can no longer be left on this suggestion.

Comments

2 years out of date, needs a drop

Item 1

Gambles

Item 2

Seller | Buyer: Untrace (dates don't match)

Seller | Buyer: Bot dump/9 keys 52 ref

Other movements untraced

Item 3

Seller | Buyer: Near ID 17159634923 shows bulk (Bills + 2 keys 28.11 ref + Dragonflies' Embrace Skating Sorcher), not mini-ing as QSstore's own autopricing for item trades isn't very reliable

Seller | Buyer: Near ID 17182312525

Item 4

Seller | Buyer: Near ID 17221183242

Seller | Buyer: Bot dump/key ID 17229022893 shows 8 keys

Item 5

Seller | Buyer: Bot dump/near ID 17030707590 shows 21+ keys, seems way off

Seller | Buyer: Untrace

Item 6

Mannco

Item 7

Seller | Buyer: Untrace

Seller | Buyer: Bot dump/Near ID 17215612623 shows 11 keys

Item 8

Seller | Buyer: 16 keys 0.55 ref

Item 9

Seller | Buyer: Near ID 16946343654 shows 12 keys

Sellers

BP - 2+2 sellers (sellers have fluctuated)

MP - 3 sellers

SCM - 2 sellers

8, 10, 10, 11, 11, 12, 16 (bot dumps are non-bolded)

Current b/o lowered to 10 keys just recently; item at QSstore for nearly a year, was previously listed at 11 keys before the drop

Bot buy order at 8.5 keys

Arguably safe to take 10 flat for now, for recent sales and dumps generally revolve around this value

I don't feel a flat value is the best representation given the number of sales you have here. 10-12 seems fine

Thanks for the reply. I do agree a range is usually better, but how should I determine whether it's okay to set the high end above the current b/o, especially if said b/o may have been unsold for some time?

Great question. There’s only 1 seller at 10 keys yet 3 sales above 10 keys, so it seems the common trading point is a little above the 10 key mark. If we exclude every sale above 10 because of the seller, then we risk putting too much emphasis on the seller, and sales should take precedence. If the 10 seller also sells this would have to be re-done anyhow.

Usually it’s just a judgement call. For example, I wouldn’t include 16 here because it’s considerably higher than the other sales and you’re excluding 8 for being too low, so they even out. It’s about picking the best range to fit the sales and the market. Hope that helps?

I think I understand a little more now. I'll be redoing the suggestion as recommended shortly. Thanks for the explanation!