- Forums
-
Pricing
- Community Pricing
- Pricegrid
- Spreadsheet
- Browse Suggestions
- Latest Changes
- Unusual Pricelist
- Browse by Item
- Browse by Effect
- Steam Community Market
- Market Pricelist
-
Trading
- Classifieds
- Classified Listings
- Utilities
- Calculator
- Premium Search
- Statistics
Counter suggestion based on this suggestion: http://backpack.tf/vote/id/516b07b24bd7b8504500000a
Sir J-j-jon [Warrior of Redwall] claims that 0.66-1.33 ref is better, but I disagree with the higher end being 1.33 ref. Proof below:
Selling for 0.66 ref:
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/10088264
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/9976987
Sold for 1 ref:
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/10009504
Being offered 0.66 ref:
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/10004743
Being offered 1 ref:
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/8749084 (recent offer, 1 week ago)
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/4902323 (retracted)
Unsold at 1.11 ref + wep:
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/9913414
Bought at 1-1.33 ref:
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/9814406
Taking into consideration that there is still one unsold at 1.11 ref, hence the high end of 1 ref. There seems to be some interest in this but 2 trades still remain unsold at 0.66 ref.
For the 2 - 3 waiting to be sold at .66, it could be argued that buyers are willing to pay more and bought from who was online. It is a rarely traded low price item.
The reason why I didn't include 1.33 as a higher range is due to the fact that the buyer in the buyers link mentioned that he was buying for around 1-1.33 ref (not 1.33 flat, so we couldn't be sure) and the sale was instantly dealth with. The rest of the 1.33 ref offers in other trades are just too old to be considered a valid proof and there's still one unsold at 1.11 ref. Which i why I suggested 0.66-1 ref.
Why didnt the last one got accepted?
2/3 positive votes, isn't that enough?
The flaw was in the proof; Key suggestions get accepted even when they have points of some -500