- Forums
-
Pricing
- Community Pricing
- Pricegrid
- Spreadsheet
- Browse Suggestions
- Latest Changes
- Unusual Pricelist
- Browse by Item
- Browse by Effect
- Steam Community Market
- Market Pricelist
-
Trading
- Classifieds
- Classified Listings
- Utilities
- Calculator
- Premium Search
- Statistics
really wanna ask vincent why he closed previous suggestion and why was the one 3 days ago accepted
http://backpack.tf/vote/id/518ce63c4bd7b8b132000003 81.15%
his point is that last one was accepted 3 days ago (are you joking vincent, have you seen the proof of 3 day ago suggestion? - no 2.9 offers at all)
I m removing 1,9 from range as everyone was complaining about it and therefore leaving only 3 top offers (excluded outlier scorching sober - bud ~ 2.7)
please do not close this one vincent or any other mod whose only proof is that last one was accepted 3 days ago (with score 5)
DO NOT CLOSE THIS MODS IF YOU DONT HAVE PROOF THAT 2.9 WAS OFFERED
Go to the forums if you have issues with the acceptance or rejection of suggestions. This is not the place to complain.
this is just resuggesting as mod had no proof to close it and i had over 80% upvotes
mistakes are being made even by mods (more than often). have you checked my proof? if you have then you have to admit his reasoning for closing my suggestion was pointless. or do you have any counterproof against this suggestion? i d love to see it (most recent trade except this one http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/5031462 sold for 2 pure 6 months ago)
While I agree with you that the current range should not have been accepted, I don't think this is a good suggestion either. There is simply not enough proof to price this thing. I'd say wait until he sells the hat, then suggest.
Don't rage at me, staying neutral.
Actually it s 1 of 1 on market and guy is inactive for 3 weeks btw b/o is somewhere around 3 pure. I set my range by 3 top offers excluding that outlier away from anything else (like bud from 1.8 majority). If you read all my comments on that accepted suggestion you may understand how raged am I especially if you see vincent comment closing mine. Im not raged on you but if you think logically you have to admit this range is best we can set right now
If this is just a resuggest, and not a complaint against the mods, then I would prefer you actually post the proof instead of link to the previous suggestion and repeatedly point to the failures of the mods.
Mistakes are made by mods, but suggestors make mistakes as well, and I think here you have made a mistake by not pasting the proof and telling the mods how to handle suggestions.
Actually proof is provided by that suggestion. I m also rather linking it because of comments and advices and also that closing comment and score. I was just worrying that it may have been closed too soon so that s why there are statements about (for) mods. I m not complaining about mods just about the way they handled this hats price. I was pretty raged when resuggesting (hope you understand why) so I was rather trying to avoid being rude when talking about mods then to copy all parts of previous suggestion proving this range
I accepted the first suggestion because the stuntsman did not seem as much of an outlier when considering fuka was offered.
#1: An outlier would be 25%-50% above the highest other offer (depending on the situation) not 12%...
#2: Now I do see you updated the price of fuka and sober. Sober update is alright. (putting the offer at ~2.7-2.8) But the fuka I have a problem with. You updated it basically quoting a bunch of lowballs that the owner did not accept.
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/9338997
offer of "peace mullet + peace sola topi + peace doctors sack + 1 bud"
Backpack lists this offer as ~2.5 (old bud price) but that is only because every hat is listed at a pathetically low 12 keys or 12-15 keys because they are ancient un-updated prices. Assuming ~16 keys each which would be much more realistic, this offer is ~2.8 at least.
It later sold to this guy for atleast the bills + max + 9 keys + ts ea (`3 buds)
http://backpack.tf/id/76561198042801740?time=1364540400
http://backpack.tf/id/76561198042801740?time=1364626800
I would personally price the fuka closer to 2.7-3.
#3: Opening a suggestion and only linking the old suggestion is already a no-no, but in addition to that you are making rude statements and demanding mods to act a certain way. I am not going to tolerate that. If you have a problem with a suggestion you bring it up in the forums: http://forums.backpack.tf/index.php?/topic/75-guidelines-for-suggestion-question-threads/
You do not open up a new suggestion and start demanding things left and right.
I am sorry but I think I avoided being rude. I think price for fuka was alright and I think copying whole suggestion instead of link is pointless. Got no time to argue with you now but I think I didnt know about that link for fuka