- Forums
-
Pricing
- Community Pricing
- Pricegrid
- Spreadsheet
- Browse Suggestions
- Latest Changes
- Unusual Pricelist
- Browse by Item
- Browse by Effect
- Steam Community Market
- Market Pricelist
-
Trading
- Classifieds
- Classified Listings
- Utilities
- Calculator
- Premium Search
- Statistics
hey guys this hat need some serious lowering
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/18173246 wants 2 s.f. scattergun's (6 buds)
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/18055574 for Green Black Hole Fr-0 and Orbiting Fire Texas Tin-Gallon ~ 7.7*0.9 = 6.9
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/17905373 for Aces High War Pig + 12 keys ~ 6.7*0.9 = 6 plus 0.6 = 6.6
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/18278992 sold for a harvest juju (outlier)
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/18224884 for Aces High Towering Pillar (outlier)
since there is an outlier above and below the sales i will use the selling for 6 bud trade and the 6.6 bud sold if you disagree you may tell me what you think the range will be
Thanks ~Mr.PotAto
all the sales here involve outdated hat prices
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/17905373 actually sold for Aces War Pig (7-8.6, outdated) + B.M.O.C. + 13 keys
( http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/17980537 http://backpack.tf/id/76561198020133234?time=1392537600 )
also there are several sales much higher than this price (but also involve outdated hats)
Downvote
P.S. I have more outdated sales if the mods are interested
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/18000647 b/o 7
also both the fro and tin gallon are greatly outdated, and aren't usable unless they are updated
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/18340337 - appears to have sold for roboactive fez (6 months old price, 6.4-6.9)
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/17827309 - appears to have sold for miami wraith wrap (5 month old price, 9.3-10.8)
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/18367559 - this hat offered on KaW muffs (no price)
All of these have outdated prices... Your first sale also involves outdated prices, and the second sale is incorrect because a BMOC was involved. The harvest juju and aces pillar involved a duped version of this hat, so those sales can be ignored. I think your suggestion may be a better range, but you need to show that the prices on outdated hats are still valid in order to pass this.
hmm I'm not very good with mini suggestions not really sure how to do them but ill pass this on for someone else to do or maybe ill re-suggest later
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/17824634 - Miami Wraith sold for KaW CM (~6.7), only recent priced sales I Could find, making it ~6 after overpay
thanks maybe this will help
<6 (duped) - http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/18224884 - b/o 6 - sold in a trade for aces tower?
<6 (duped) - http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/18173246 - b/o 2 SF scatters
~6 (clean) - http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/17905373 - b/os on the warpig at 5.5; http://backpack.tf/vote/id/531c6b144cd7b8b8548b4568 - this suggestion indicates that it might even be lower
6.7 (clean) - http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/17827309 - MN wraith - offered so no overpay ~6.7
~6.5-7 (clean) - http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/16843394 - RA fez
<7 - http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/18055574 - GBH fro + of tin gallon
<7 - http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/18367559 - b/o on the muffs was 7, so it should be no higher than that
? - http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/17186389 - The harvest juju was a duped one. So that may not be an outlier
Mini-Suggestions -------
~6.7 - RA fez: only 1 recent sale
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/16843394 - moon whoopee + 4 keys, offered so no overpay
~6.5 - Moon Whoopee: only 1 recent sale on the clean one
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/16512218 - sold for blizz toque + stormy bubble + blizz fez + smoking tree ~6.5 http://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198061293463 - dec 27
GBH fr-0
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/17326461 - b/o 6.5 (trade involved electrostatic noir)
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/17327019 - b/o 6
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/18337672 - selling both for 6
So sales of the clean one at 6, 6.7, 6.7, <7, <7. A few of those sales are unclear. The duped one seems to be going consistently less than 6. Two of those sales (at <7) are hard to determine, but based on b/os they should not be valued higher than 7. Perhaps a high end of 6-6.7 would have been the closer value based on our sales, but this suggestion seems to be pretty close.