- Forums
-
Pricing
- Community Pricing
- Pricegrid
- Spreadsheet
- Browse Suggestions
- Latest Changes
- Unusual Pricelist
- Browse by Item
- Browse by Effect
- Steam Community Market
- Market Pricelist
-
Trading
- Classifieds
- Classified Listings
- Utilities
- Calculator
- Premium Search
- Statistics
B/o 4.5: http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/19548829
B/o 4: http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/18405981 (No one bought it)
B/o 3.5: http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/19260586 (2 weeks)
you need sales not B/O's.
You can lower a price with just B/O's.
forgot that :s
No, you just never read about what made a good suggestion, because if you did, you would've never made that comment. It seems highly unlikely that you could forget something like that.
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/19260586 and http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/18405981 http://backpack.tf/item/2184287029 Duped !
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/19548829 first owner - not good proof
Why not ?
90 % first owners sold cheap than real price , also need sales but not only B/O's
It would be nice if you would stop being lazy and find some damn sales. It doesn't take much time.
Until then, neutral.
If it can't sell for 2 weeks at 3.5, why is the high end 4.5?
what should be the high end ?
It should be based on a sale.
He had a B/o of 4.5 buds - http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/19556541
sold for a dead president towering pillar of hats
b/o of tower:
3 buds - http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/19545460
So you are showing proof that even 3.5 might be too high. This is exactly why we don't like pricing off b/os.
Sorry, but we have formally stopped allowing suggestions based only on b/os. http://forums.backpack.tf/index.php?/topic/6033-new-unusual-price-suggestion-guide-the-cheat-sheet/page-2?p=116893#entry116893
This will need more digging into