This suggestion was marked as bad price range and closed
by neverclever.
The price range was either too broad or did not accurately reflect how the item was traded.
Therefore, this suggestion has been closed.
Message left by moderator:
While there are several of these around, most of them have been sitting in their owner's backpacks for a while.
However, evilicion is right that at the time the sale value would have been 1.4 -- when pricing old sales, it is best to keep the original value, since the value of buds can fluctuate so much.
Please resuggest at 1.4.
Comments can no longer be left on this suggestion.
that was sold on june 20th. more than 2 months ago.
an at the time,buds were 16. so it's 1.4
read the top of the trade "2 months ago" the trade was made "3 months ago" but was closed 2 months ago cas it sold..
click on the "2 months ago"
june 20- last bump
so it got sold 2 months and 16 days ago~ which OP rounds to 2 months
So? As long as its under 3 months it doesnt matter and its the MOST RECENT SOLD so its ok..
Edit: also it doesnt matter if buds change or not. If a bud goes to 100 keys and an item is 3 buds, that doesnt make it worth like 10 keys
under 2 months*
Nope and as i said its the most recent sold so i have to use it. Or i don't use any solds at all -.-
then there wouldn't be a rule to not use old sales.
it would be just "use the most recent sale"
and considering 11 exist,i hardly believe it's the only sale. someone with premium would easily get another one
Also as polar says Exceptions: For very rare hats, if there have only been 1-2 sales in the last 3 months, a trade up to 3 months old is okay to use as proof to establish more data points. Keep in mind, new sales should take precedence over older ones
very rare
3rd gen
very rare
3rd gen
nope <,<
Are you joking? Just because its third gen it cant be rare? Ok go find some more solds and sellers if its "not rare"
(sorry if i sound mean)
you don't.
ask someone with premium to find you more hats and boom.
the current lack on the market doesn't mean anything.
also i told you. buds were 16 at the time. so it's 1.4 even if going by the oudated sale
Please re-read my statement.
And im off to bed.. Goodnight
you should re-read my statement.
+ the 1.4 buds thing....
Actually, the trade is not outdated and is still valid proof.
According to the rules, "Hats with an outdated price (>3 months old) are not valid proof. Again, please include links for outdated hats in your suggestion as supplemental proof. Just don't rely on them to set your range."
Two and a half months old is fine if there are no more available sales, it's not preferred though.
Also, the current lack on the market means the hat is rare, even if there are more in existence. For example, this recent suggestion involving a TW Dixie was accepted with 1 sale. There are 20 in existence and only 1 on Outpost at the time -> http://backpack.tf/vote/id/5405fad24dd7b8c3798b4587
I hope I've solved your doubts.
@ḎℰѦÐ! бум (Boom)!S>UNUSUALS, you should use the price of buds at the time of the sale. It is more accurate, especially with the recent price change.
So doodle, I trust you cause dat green name. Would should the new price be?
1.4
22 / 16
simple
but the dixie didn't use old proof.
so it isn't exactly as that
and polar found some extra proofz
polar??? wher is polar
the 22 keys sale was a quicksale,it wasnt a offer i got, i offered it a quickbuyer since i wanted some pure.
still most recent sold :3.
its a pain in the ass to sell this think i should´ve thought about that as i quickbought it for a bud
They are a pain to sell? well thats why they going down lol
4 month old price
# Safe n sound unusual pricing spree
Proof:
seller:
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/20503680 (b/o 2 buds, hasnt sold in 2 months, showing that it needs a drop)
Solds:
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/20059452 (2 month old sold, but most recent ive found. 22 keys sold for (1.19 buds, if i put this as price bp.tf would probs round it up to 1.20. Proof: http://i.imgur.com/83PzBwQ.png )
Thanks
that was sold on june 20th. more than 2 months ago.
an at the time,buds were 16. so it's 1.4
read the top of the trade "2 months ago" the trade was made "3 months ago" but was closed 2 months ago cas it sold..
click on the "2 months ago"
june 20- last bump
so it got sold 2 months and 16 days ago~ which OP rounds to 2 months
So? As long as its under 3 months it doesnt matter and its the MOST RECENT SOLD so its ok..
Edit: also it doesnt matter if buds change or not. If a bud goes to 100 keys and an item is 3 buds, that doesnt make it worth like 10 keys
under 2 months*
Nope and as i said its the most recent sold so i have to use it. Or i don't use any solds at all -.-
then there wouldn't be a rule to not use old sales.
it would be just "use the most recent sale"
and considering 11 exist,i hardly believe it's the only sale. someone with premium would easily get another one
Also as polar says Exceptions: For very rare hats, if there have only been 1-2 sales in the last 3 months, a trade up to 3 months old is okay to use as proof to establish more data points. Keep in mind, new sales should take precedence over older ones
very rare
3rd gen
very rare
3rd gen
nope <,<
Are you joking? Just because its third gen it cant be rare? Ok go find some more solds and sellers if its "not rare"
(sorry if i sound mean)
you don't.
ask someone with premium to find you more hats and boom.
the current lack on the market doesn't mean anything.
also i told you. buds were 16 at the time. so it's 1.4 even if going by the oudated sale
Please re-read my statement.
And im off to bed.. Goodnight
you should re-read my statement.
+ the 1.4 buds thing....
Actually, the trade is not outdated and is still valid proof.
According to the rules, "Hats with an outdated price (>3 months old) are not valid proof. Again, please include links for outdated hats in your suggestion as supplemental proof. Just don't rely on them to set your range."
Two and a half months old is fine if there are no more available sales, it's not preferred though.
Also, the current lack on the market means the hat is rare, even if there are more in existence. For example, this recent suggestion involving a TW Dixie was accepted with 1 sale. There are 20 in existence and only 1 on Outpost at the time -> http://backpack.tf/vote/id/5405fad24dd7b8c3798b4587
I hope I've solved your doubts.
@ḎℰѦÐ! бум (Boom)!S>UNUSUALS, you should use the price of buds at the time of the sale. It is more accurate, especially with the recent price change.
So doodle, I trust you cause dat green name. Would should the new price be?
1.4
22 / 16
simple
but the dixie didn't use old proof.
so it isn't exactly as that
and polar found some extra proofz
polar??? wher is polar
the 22 keys sale was a quicksale,it wasnt a offer i got, i offered it a quickbuyer since i wanted some pure.
still most recent sold :3.
its a pain in the ass to sell this think i should´ve thought about that as i quickbought it for a bud
They are a pain to sell? well thats why they going down lol