Suggestion: The Machina at 0.05 ref

All weapons are unsolds for a scrap. Theire not easy to sell. You need sellers under 1 scrap, solds etc.This is an extremely lazy suggestion as you stated yourself and i suggest you close it right now!

Um, "theire" isn't a word. If you meant "their", then you are a grammatical idiot. If you meant "there", you still are. If you somehow meant "they're", then you know grammar a bit better.

What are you doing on this site

Helping out with grammar. And why the downvotes? I may be hated, but I'm right.

The patheticity is strong with this one.

I can't wait till you get banned

You can get banned for correcting one's grammar?

You get banned for spamming a suggestion, read the rules.

But... if that's a rule, aren't we all culprit? Mostly you and me?

I'm sure helping out with grammar isn't against the rules, but you could have been a little nicer about it. Maybe you didn't mean to sound rude, but I dunno, calling someone a potential "grammatical idiot" doesn't seem all that nice. A simple *they're would suffice.

Yeah, I mentioned I was a bit rude earlier. You know, just those evil pet peeves.

You can get banned for being a prick. Not saying any names. Ahem.

I'm not gonna say names, but... I didn't call anyone an offensive word except for "idiot" a few times, before I admitted I was wrong.

Does "patheticity" even exist?

this is now a grammar correction suggestion

What did you think this was? A place to vote for prices? Come on, people! Let's focus on the future of the economy!

Because, just as Pulse stated, your comment has nothing to do with the suggestion and you were rude about it; just because his spelling was incorrect doesn't give you the right to insult him.

You're right, I shouldn't have been so rude. I've just got a bit of a pet peeve with poor grammar sometimes, you know?

Who cares? Your comment has nothing to do with the suggestion.

You called?

You don't actually need sellers at 0.05 for lowering a normal weapon, as everyone is selling for 1 scrap. Therefore the only thing he needs is unsolds, but this is clearly not enough unsolds.

My bad, thanks based zcrab c:

Alright, sorry about not enough proof. I will create another suggestion when I have time with all the unsolds I find

"But i'm lazy" No. You made the suggestion, Please provide this "ton more" you speak of.

Click on the link below that.

You don't understand my point. You made the suggestion, you are supposed to provide the evidence. We aren't supposed to find it for you.

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/21537713

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/22038471

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/13992008

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/22001942

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/22307117

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/10666233

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/21946379

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/6736146

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/22564242

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/14260212

Wouldn't 10 examples be enough proof? I wouldn't want to spend hours copy/pasting a bunch of trades.

If you want to be lazy, Don't make a price suggestion. Especially for one this large with so much available proof.

Sure, unsolds at 1 scrap. ~~What about the proof on why it should be at 0.05 Ref?~~

EDITED: Actually, I'm gonna stay neutral. The main core of the proof is to provide Unsolds to lower a weapon down.

However, there's a LOT more on Outpost which isn't enough compared to what proof you are showing to us.

Scrap.tf is supporting proof but barely much (8 bots our of 17 have them, 1-3 per bot but the Count Scrapula is only for Donators to the site).

http://imgur.com/VYOpIiN stock on scrap.tf

It's been stated by Polar I think, that the main source of proof for weapons suggestions should be unsolds, but this proof is so small it doesn't make a difference.

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/21229343

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/22765431

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/22778348 (or wep for wep for some reason)

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/21925762

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/22321277

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/22832035

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/21712595

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/21909914

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/21860195

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/22598245

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/21537713

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/22038471

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/13992008

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/22001942

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/22307117

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/10666233

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/21946379

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/6736146

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/22564242

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/14260212

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/17406495

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/22769716

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/22841600

Small?

This proof is bad. Period.

The 3rd link which you said is a wep for wep isn't even right, he even says in the notes that the 1st item (machina) is selling for 1 scrap.

The rest of these if you actually bother to click the machina's listed have new owners which means they sold already. The rest of the links are extremely young, some less than a few hours old.

I've sold several of these in the last few days with poorly bumped trades and still have been getting trade offers requested for them.

He is selling all of those weapons for one of those three offers, read the full notes on the trade.

You don't know he doesn't have more in stock. And attempting to end a discussion with "period" makes you look childish. Doing so and then continuing to speak makes you look dumb on top of that.

You whining about my point and saying that saying anything else to back up my point makes you look even dumber. I actually clicked the trade links and clicked the owners as well which I'm pretty sure I can't say the same for you.

I have every right to call the proof bad as I see fit. Go cry somewhere else if you don't like it.

>implying he was crying

Plus you didn't read the trade notes, he was selling for one of three things.

Basically you kinda have the correct proof - unsolds. But if you really wanna have this suggestion pass, you should see if they actually sold - click on the item and you can check the history - if it changed owner.

Personally I believe this is a wanted weapon and it's possible to sell for a scrap, as Kiki says, but screenshots or links would be nice as a counter proof.

But I suggest you to close this suggestion and start a new one with as many links as you can provide (but not too young - they should be at least 1 day old) and check if the items actually changed owners.

sooooo little prooof

downvote