Suggestion: Taunt: Square Dance at 6.33–6.66 ref

Price Suggestion

~1.35 keys

158 votes up

74 votes down

Related Suggestions

This suggestion was accepted Sat, 15 Nov 14 16:13:56 +0000 by polar.

Comments can no longer be left on this suggestion.

Comments

damn range glitch...

sellers for 6.55 under

http://bazaar.tf/trade/1107075

http://bazaar.tf/trade/1079975

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/23651472

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/23635433

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/23565060

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/23693169

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/23703844

unsolds for 6.66

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/23593435

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/23541616

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/23613206

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/23659504

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/23658064

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/23676929

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/23622391

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/23653064

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/23643510

also classifieds http://backpack.tf/stats/Unique/Taunt%3A%20Square%20Dance/Tradable/Craftable

1@ 6

1@ 6.22

1@ 6.44

4@ 6.55

so many sellers for 7 ref

tell me anything thats wrong.

Next time list the classifieds out for us.

example:

Classified listings-

1@ 6

1@ 6.22

1@ 6.44

4@ 6.55

that sort of thing is one of the best ways to format classified proof.

alright still decently new to this

there's no glitch u juzt a dum ass nigga

inb4 bananated

cry me a river white boy.

fite me wite trash

im black u racist. I'm a nigga, u a snowman.

kek, you will get bananated

use q's next time as you won't be obviously and blatantly banned.

You've got potential here.

Proof is good, upvote.

are you kidding? This suggestion is sh*t. All he put here was a bunch of unvalid sellers.

*invalid

If you're gonna try proving this wrong, at least spell right.

Telling people their opinion is incorrect because their spelling/grammar is erroneous only proves you cannot disprove their logic. Saying someone's argument is invalid because they spelled something wrong is very nearly ad-hominem, and is very immature.

Lemon is correct in saying that many of the sellers are not valid. 6.33 refined is also not supported enough to be in the range.

Furthermore, if you have an issue with bad spelling and/or grammar, you might want to look at your own.

You misused your comma. The second part of the sentence division is not a full clause.

You misused the word "right." While it can be used to mean "correct," it cannot operate on verbs, including "spell."

Your use of "this" has no connecting subject, therefore is ambiguous. It is unknown what "this" is referring to. "This" could refer to the suggestion, or your comment.

He just gives me a generic reason as to why it's not a good suggestion. Nothing specific.

So... silence.

Many of the links are invalid, including unclear prices at times. Some of which are too young or poorly bumped. He provided 2 links to 6.33 on outpost, one of which is invalid, because it is too young. Any sellers below 6.66 are uncommon enough to be considered quicksells.

While the way Lemon put his point across was concise, and somewhat rude, he is correct nonetheless.

Eh, fine.

How are they invalid

2 sellers for 6.33 on outpost, and one is only 5 hours old. That isnt enough to include it in the range.

~~Counterproof?~~

Personal experience.... Sold this for 6.66 ref today just saying: http://puu.sh/cRc7C/c9574dacb4.png

Quite a few sellers under 6.66 now

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/23699979

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/23510654

Plus those in classies