Suggestion: Burning Flames Hive Minder at 150–155 keys

Price Suggestion

~99 keys

burning

115 votes up

30 votes down

Related Suggestions

This suggestion was closed Fri, 06 Feb 15 20:43:31 +0000 by the submitter.

Comments can no longer be left on this suggestion.

Comments

RIP

Sale #1: 22.7 buds outlier

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/24093650

Sold for a Cloudy Moon Desert Marauder, It’s A Secret To Everybody Sergeant’s Drill Hat, and 30 keys pure

11.8 * 0.9 = 10.6 buds

10.6 + 10 + 2.1 = 22.7 buds

Sale #2: 12.4 buds

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/23364696

Offered with a Burning Towering Pillar of Hats on a Scorching Flames Samur-Eye

25 - 12.6 = 12.4 buds

Sale #3: 12 buds

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/23169024

Sold for 12 buds pure

Cloudy Moon Desert Marauder Mini: 10 buds

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/23547419

“Quicksold” for 10 buds pure

Burning Towering Pillar of Hats Mini: 12.6 buds

http://backpack.tf/profiles/76561198164979447?time=1420272000

Sold for an Anti-Freeze

Sale #3 is outdated. Cannot be used.

Sale #2 seems to be an outlier and pretty close to being outdated too.

Sale #1 seems inaccurate. You didn't apply overpay properly on the Cloudy Moon, your previous suggestion on the Cloudy Moon needed further clarification on that 10 bud sale, and the Secret Drill Hat is duped. Requires mini suggestions out of the wazoo.

Also, there is another sale that throws your #2 and #3 sales off-balance. Downvote on the basis of inaccuracy and outdated proof.

Overpay isn't needed on the Marauder because in the mini it was sold for pure. Thus its pure value has already been obtained.

And, care to showcase this sale that upsets 2 and 3? Because you haven't in your suggestion.

#3 was sold in mid-October. We're at the end of January and that's over three months old.

#3 was supporting #2 and since we can't use #3 and a new sale supports #1, #2 is the actual outlier. Not #1.

The moderator had asked for clarification on the 10 bud sale on the Marauder and the suggester never bothered.

I'm not supporting this suggestion, I was merely clarifying.

Alright. I don't mind clarifying it for you.

No, see, I was clarifying for you as to why the marauder didn't require overpay.

It's late for me. I guess it should be time for sleep soon.

Yet, it doesn't make any sense. The person offered both of the items (along with pure) for the trade, which applies that overpay needs to be presented on both items, regardless of a mini-suggestion required.

Nope, wrong. If the mini provided is in pure, no overpay is necessary.

Refer to the comments here:

http://backpack.tf/vote/id/548f7dacb88d882f158b4b1c

Considering that the trade with the Samur-Eye i did is already quite some time ago, i wouldnt consider this as solid proof for any price suggestions. Furthermore there have been more sales after your sale #1 (and even that one is more recently than your sale #2, you still consider that as an outlier in comparism to the sale #2).