Suggestion: Sunbeams Armored Authority at 100.1 keys

Price Suggestion

~167.5 keys

sunbeams

138 votes up

11 votes down

Related Suggestions

This suggestion was closed automatically because another price suggestion was accepted instead.

Comments can no longer be left on this suggestion.

Comments

If you're going to be stubborn so be it.

SALES:

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/23990958 Sold for 120 keys

BUT B/O of 7.7 = 7.7

Histories;

http://imgur.com/Pz4LOkn

Let it ride.

You did not read my argument. sad...

I read it. I also disagree with it.

Well we can't make the prices for each individual hat after whatever one random guy values his Buds at.

We need to use the same amount, otherwise all hats would be impossible to compare since most would have used different prices for Buds in their suggestion. It only make sense to use the suggested price for Buds on backpack.tf on suggestions for unusuals on Backpack.tf.

Your argument is invalid sadly

Logic please

You first.

Already done.

I've yet to see it.

Going against a B/O in itself makes no sense. Unless you're trying to gain profit from this.

Read the rules please.

Then show your counter-argument. I already win a person who had same mind with you

http://backpack.tf/vote/id/549d2f9fba8d8835768b48f0

Counter-argument is the B/O was 7.7. End of.

Well actually there is a point, maybe pricing it in Keys is better. He even rejected 8 Buds in Keys at that time, but that's none of buisness.

Well well well

Isn't it the manipulator again :/

If simply his B/O was 7.7, I ll not argue. But there are some complex content. Your argument is B/O was 7.7. I m claming that b/o is not valid because he was not accpeting bud, he was accepting only keys. So how can I pay his B/O in buds? I offered 105 keys(7.9) first and he declined it. The B/O was simply kind of fake.

Repeating your argument won't help, I've read it.

Some people are repeating same argument so I thought they did not read my argument.