Suggestion: Nebula Captain Space Mann at 1250–1350 keys

Price Suggestion

~12350 keys

nebula

50 votes up

13 votes down

Related Suggestions

This suggestion was accepted Sun, 24 Jul 16 22:20:13 +0000 by Vijf Kilo Boter (met voetjes).

Comments can no longer be left on this suggestion.

Comments

This suggestion is necessarily dumb. Like really really aggressively stupid. But it'll pass, so...

SALES:

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/28151963 Sold for Scorching Patriot Peak (Open suggestion at 1400 IT WAS LITERALLY PRICED AT 1400 WHILE THIS WAS OPEN 1250)

Histories:

http://backpack.tf/profiles/76561198125791160#!/compare/1463270400/1463356800

http://backpack.tf/profiles/76561198086605050#!/compare/1463270400/1463356800

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/28147163 Quicksold

(Credit to Mighty Bob)

http://backpack.tf/profiles/76561198086605050#!/compare/1463616000/1463702400

Sold for Scorching Peak ("1250") + C9 Sammy Cap (55) + GGjr Sensei (45) = 1350

Can't find links but iirc Purp sold this + Scorching Peak ("""1250""") for Scorching KE (Outdated at 2500)

Should probably be used to update the KE (But is also the reason this is lower. Like I said. REALLY not smart.)

C9 Sammy mini:

http://backpack.tf/suggestion/573edb1e86674774ab0af586 - 55 keys

GGjr Sensei mini:

No recent sales, using previous price which was a pure sale

Let it ride. Ugh.

There are 4 other sales which are not used for a reason: One huge quicksell at like 700 keys. One immense unusual overpay for a golden pan (pans sell frequently for up to 2000 in unusuals). One strange sale around 800 keys which was immediately resold for like 2000 keys. So this should be fine now especially since no one can argue now that the peak is too high.

Some people still value this at 500 keys and get mad when you offer it to them on their 1500 key items...

I mean, they are tho

By accusing the mods of bias you are in turn displaying your own bias against them. So why don't we all cool off a bit and be grown-ups about this.

If you want to discuss moderator bias, do it on the forums, not the suggestion. Post evidence that disproves his point, or cut it out.

There are 6 sales of this hat.

1250, 1350, 700, 800, "like 2000" and I presume a very small # (golden pan overpay)

We're neglecting 3 low sales and 1 high sale

That is not balanced. That is not fair. That is not an accurate representation of what this hat has sold for.

But it will pass. For reasons that I can apparently only discuss in the forums.

Well, 800 and 2000 were sales on the strange version. We can ignore those here, we aren't pricing the strange version.

Obviously people overpay for golden pans.

There's another sale at 1250, that is noted above, you'll notice, that I'm not using because the KE would need updating and I don't have the vote power for that. But it's approximately that value. Possibly higher, I can't see that KE dropping any time soon.

So actually the usable sales are 700, 1250, 1250 and 1350. That is balanced and fair. The irony is in your accusations of bias, you're very biased yourself.

so if I believe you. (which I don't)

700, 1250, 1250, and 1350 becomes 1250-1350 and that is 'balanced'

Balance would be loping off one high and one low for 1250 flat (still absurdly high imo, especially when we take into account strange going for 800 one time lmao)

I'd also like to take this opportunity to point out that the sum of everything you've owned at a given point has never surpassed 1/3rd of this price suggestion, so I'm sure you're highly qualified to commentate

1350 is 100 away 1250, 700 is 550 away from 1250.

spot the obvious outlier

Just fyi, I sold mine for $2700 on marketplace. They take 10% of course as a broker fee essentially. With the fact that the peak was basically priced at the same time as these sales at 1400, as gent has pointed out, makes you think eh