No, the other suggestion has a sale that would be around 300 350. It is poorly labeled and the prices linked to it seem to come from nowhere

https://backpack.tf/profiles/76561198073872845#!/compare/1481932800/1485820800

sold with the RPS (~53) for the MG law (~320) + cyclone RPS (outdated, sellers @45-50) and c9 fuka (outdated, sellers at 25). Coincidentally, his values on the rps and fuka are okay, but the law is shown with a lowered value for no apparent reason. Either way, that sale's going to be around 350.

Additionally, the casemaker sale not being directly usable does not mean the sale did not happen. Bear in mind that despite the fact that hats may be outdated, people still use bptf as a reference in order to establish offer ballparks for themselves. While these values may not hold any significance in suggestions directly, it can be an indication as to why certain sales look low, high, or - in this case - about right. For example, when a hat is being updated to drop from 100 to 50, you sometimes see other suggestions where something currently priced around 100 sold for that hat, whereas it has other sales that back up 100. 50 is then an obvious outlier, that can be explained by the outdated bptf price.

The person you got the executioner from obviously didnt value the case at 300 or exe at 100, nor did he value it at 480. At current prices, that sale would back up 300 by approximation.

Even if we do not take that into consideration, we can go back to outlier reasoning here: we have a 3+ month seller at 300 (he may not be the most active, but he has been there for more than 3 months, and no one paid him 300 pure keys in that time, so if anyone wanted this hat, all he'd need is 300 keys. Again, bear in mind backpack.tf aims to reflect pure values), and sales at (according to your value approximation) ~100, ~350 and ~485. Cutting off the low and high ends there seems pretty reasonable, especially looking at the kind of hats they sold for:

- The low sale is a sale made on an "overpriced hat", that - at current - would support 300.

- The high end sale is based on an unpriced, new item with a suggestion based on 1 sale. Who is to say that hat does not need a larger range?

Since both sales have indications that they may not reflect a proper value for this hat, I would most certainly not use just one of these sales. Similar reasoning may say to only use the case sale, as all others should be cut off by the unsold, to which I definitely do not agree, by the way, but nor do I agree with this proposed price.